Quality assessment in rehabilitation centres:: The indicator system 'Quality Profile'

被引:23
作者
Farin, E
Follert, P
Gerdes, N
Jäckel, WH
Thalau, J
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Freiburg, Dept Qual Management & Social Med, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
[2] Hochrhein Inst Rehabil Res, Bad Sackingen, Germany
[3] Allgemeine Ortskrankenkassen Bunderverband, Bonn, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1080/09638280410001711441
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Purpose: An indicator system for measuring the quality of rehabilitation centres ('Quality Profile' of rehabilitation centres) is presented. The implementation of the concept is explained with the aid of results regarding structural, process and outcome quality in 26 cardiac and orthopaedic rehabilitation centres. Method: In each centre, structural, process and outcome quality, including patient and employee satisfaction, are measured. Process quality is determined by means of a peer review procedure that includes examination of 20 randomly selected cases on the basis of discharge reports and therapy plans. The medical outcome is measured by a prospective study with three measurement time points and a sample of approx. N = 200 patients per centre. Results: Overall, the level of quality of the medical rehabilitation in the institutions participating in the study must be considered high. However, on almost all quality dimensions, even after a risk adjustment there are clear differences between centres, which point to the usefulness of benchmarking analyses and the need for improvements in quality in some centres. Conclusions: The indicator system presented is a starting-point for comprehensive, comparative measurement of the quality of in-patient rehabilitation centres that, with regard to its principles, also appears applicable to other areas of health care.
引用
收藏
页码:1096 / 1104
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Methods for external evaluation of health care institutions [J].
Bohigas, L ;
Heaton, C .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2000, 12 (03) :231-238
[2]   INCIDENCE OF ADVERSE EVENTS AND NEGLIGENCE IN HOSPITALIZED-PATIENTS - RESULTS OF THE HARVARD MEDICAL-PRACTICE STUDY-I [J].
BRENNAN, TA ;
LEAPE, LL ;
LAIRD, NM ;
HEBERT, L ;
LOCALIO, AR ;
LAWTHERS, AG ;
NEWHOUSE, JP ;
WEILER, PC ;
HIATT, HH .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1991, 324 (06) :370-376
[3]  
Brook R H, 1986, Int J Technol Assess Health Care, V2, P53
[4]   PREDICTING THE APPROPRIATE USE OF CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY, UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, AND CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY [J].
BROOK, RH ;
PARK, RE ;
CHASSIN, MR ;
SOLOMON, DH ;
KEESEY, J ;
KOSECOFF, J .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1990, 323 (17) :1173-1177
[5]   Defining and measuring quality of care: a perspective from US researchers [J].
Brook, RH ;
McGlynn, EA ;
Shekelle, PG .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2000, 12 (04) :281-295
[6]  
*CARF REH ACCR COM, 1998, PERF IND REH PROGR V
[7]   Health outcomes. New quality measure for Medicare [J].
Cooper, JK ;
Kohlmann, T ;
Michael, JA ;
Haffer, SC ;
Stevic, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2001, 13 (01) :9-16
[8]   The Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation report of patients discharged from comprehensive medical rehabilitation programs in 1999 [J].
Deutsch, A ;
Fiedler, RC ;
Granger, CV ;
Russell, CF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2002, 81 (02) :133-142
[9]  
Donabedian A, 1992, QRB Qual Rev Bull, V18, P356
[10]   Mental health care quality under managed care in the United States: A view from the Health Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS) [J].
Druss, BG ;
Miller, CL ;
Rosenheck, RA ;
Shih, SC ;
Bost, JE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 159 (05) :860-862