How long do routine dental restorations last? A systematic review

被引:81
作者
Downer, MC
Azli, NA
Bedi, R
Moles, DR
Setchell, DJ
机构
[1] UCL Eastman Dent Inst Oral Hlth Care Sci, Natl Ctr Transcultural Oral Hlth, London WC1X 8LD, England
[2] UCL Eastman Dent Inst Oral Hlth Care Sci, Conservat Dept, London WC1X 8LD, England
关键词
D O I
10.1038/sj.bdj.4800298a1
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective To conduct a systematic review of the Literature on the longevity of routine dental restorations in permanent posterior teeth, and to identify and examine factors influencing its variability. Method Accepted guidelines were followed. An advisory group oversaw the project. Simple Class I and Class II amalgam, composite resin, glass ionomer and cast gold restorations were covered. Comprehensive searching of electronic databases, hand-searching, and location of 'grey' Literature, generated 124 research reports. Those considered relevant were assessed for validity and quality according to agreed criteria. The analysis was descriptive. Results Eight of 58 relevant research reports were categorised, according to agreed criteria, as being of satisfactory validity and quality. They suggested that 50% of all restorations last 10 to 20 years, although both higher and lower median survival, times were reported. The findings were supported by the totality of studies reviewed. However, variability was substantial. Restoration type, materials, the patient, the operator, the practice environment and type of care system appeared to influence longevity. Conclusions Many studies were imperfect in design. Those considered to be the most appropriate for analysis were too limited to undertake a formal statistical exploration. Therefore there remains a need for definitive randomised controlled trials of restoration longevity, of sound design and adequate power, employing standardised assessments and appropriate methods of analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:432 / 439
页数:8
相关论文
共 132 条
[61]   The influence of the amalgam alloy on the survival of amalgam restorations: A secondary analysis of multiple controlled clinical trials [J].
Letzel, H ;
VanTHof, MA ;
Marshall, GW ;
Marshall, SJ .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1997, 76 (11) :1787-1798
[62]   A CONTROLLED CLINICAL-STUDY OF AMALGAM RESTORATIONS - SURVIVAL, FAILURES, AND CAUSES OF FAILURE [J].
LETZEL, H ;
VANTHOF, MA ;
VRIJHOEF, MMA ;
MARSHALL, GW ;
MARSHALL, SJ .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1989, 5 (02) :115-121
[63]   EFFECT OF THE OPERATOR ON THE CLINICAL-PERFORMANCE OF AMALGAM [J].
MAHLER, DB ;
MARANTZ, R .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1979, 99 (01) :38-41
[64]   LONGEVITY OF DENTAL RESTORATIONS IN SELECTED PATIENTS FROM DIFFERENT PRACTICE ENVIRONMENTS [J].
MAHMOOD, S ;
SMALES, RJ .
AUSTRALIAN DENTAL JOURNAL, 1994, 39 (01) :15-17
[65]  
Maryniuk G A, 1985, J Dent Educ, V49, P769
[66]   IN SEARCH OF TREATMENT LONGEVITY - A 30-YEAR PERSPECTIVE [J].
MARYNIUK, GA .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1984, 109 (05) :739-744
[67]   LONGEVITY OF RESTORATIONS - SURVEY RESULTS OF DENTISTS ESTIMATES AND ATTITUDES [J].
MARYNIUK, GA ;
KAPLAN, SH .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1986, 112 (01) :39-45
[68]  
Matis B A, 1996, Quintessence Int, V27, P373
[69]   HOW FINISHING AFFECTS GLASS IONOMERS - RESULTS OF A 5-YEAR EVALUATION [J].
MATIS, BA ;
CARLSON, T ;
COCHRAN, M ;
PHILLIPS, RW .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1991, 122 (08) :43-46
[70]  
MAYHEW MT, 1995, UNPUB EVALUATION AVE