Conceptions of evidence use in school districts: Mapping the Terrain

被引:140
作者
Coburn, Cynthia E. [1 ]
Talbert, Joan E.
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Grad Sch Educ, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Ctr Res Context Teaching, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1086/505056
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Current policies place unprecedented demands on districts to use evidence to guide their educational improvement efforts. How districts respond is likely to be influenced by how individuals in the district conceptualize what it means to use evidence in their ongoing work. This study draws on sensemaking and institutional theory to investigate how individuals in one urban school district conceive of evidence-based practice. The study develops grounded typologies that describe the ways that individuals conceptualize high-quality evidence, appropriate evidence use, and high-quality research. It then explains variation in conceptions, pointing to the ways organizational responsibilities and reform history shape how individuals come to understand evidence-based practice. The article closes by suggesting implications for district response to federal policy demands for evidence-based practice.
引用
收藏
页码:469 / 495
页数:27
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], STRAT PLAN 2002 2007
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, The practical guide: Identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight, and obesity in adults
[3]  
[Anonymous], THESIS STANFORD U
[4]  
[Anonymous], ED EVALUATION POLICY
[5]  
ARCHER J, 2005, ED WEEK 0914, V14, pS5
[7]  
Brown J.S., 2000, SOCIAL LIFE INFORM
[8]   Linking Data and Learning: The Grow Network Study [J].
Brunner, Cornelia ;
Fasca, Chad ;
Heinze, Juliette ;
Honey, Margaret ;
Light, Daniel ;
Mandinach, Ellen ;
Wexler, Dara .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATION FOR STUDENTS PLACED AT RISK, 2005, 10 (03) :241-267
[9]  
Burch P., 2004, LEADING MIDDLE MIDLE
[10]   HOW SUBJECTS MATTER IN DISTRICT OFFICE PRACTICE: INSTRUCTIONALLY RELEVANT POLICY IN URBAN SCHOOL DISTRICT REDESIGN [J].
Burch, Patricia ;
Spillane, James P. .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL CHANGE, 2005, 6 (01) :51-76