Femoral component rotation and arthrofibrosis following mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty

被引:93
作者
Boldt, J. G.
Stiehl, J. B.
Hodler, J.
Zanetti, M.
Munzinger, U.
机构
[1] St Vinzenz Hosp, Dusseldorf, Germany
[2] Columbia St Marys Hosp, Milwaukee, WI USA
[3] Orthoped Univ Hosp Balgrist, Dept Radiol, Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Schulthness Clin, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s00264-006-0085-z
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the femoral component rotation in a small subset of patients who had developed arthrofibrosis after mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Arthrofibrosis was defined as flexion less than 90 degrees or a flexion contracture greater than 10 degrees following TKA. From a consecutive cohort of 3,058 mobile-bearing TKAs, 49 (1.6%) patients were diagnosed as having arthrofibrosis, of which 38 (86%) could be recruited for clinical assessment. Femoral rotation of a control group of 38 asymptomatic TKA patients matched for age, gender, and body mass index was also evaluated. The surgical epicondylar axis was compared with the posterior condylar axis for the femoral prosthesis. Femoral components in the arthrofibrosis group were significantly internally rotated by a mean of 4.7 degrees (SD 2.2 degrees, range 10 degrees internal to 1 degrees external). In the control group, the femoral component had a mean 0.3 degrees internal rotation (SD 2.3 degrees, range 4 degrees internal to 6 degrees external). Following mobile-bearing TKA, there is a significant correlation between internal femoral component rotation and chronic arthrofibrosis.
引用
收藏
页码:420 / 425
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]
ANOUCHI YS, 1993, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P170
[2]
FEMORAL ROTATIONAL ALIGNMENT, BASED ON THE ANTEROPOSTERIOR AXIS, IN TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY IN A VALGUS KNEE - A TECHNICAL NOTE [J].
ARIMA, J ;
WHITESIDE, LA ;
MCCARTHY, DS ;
WHITE, SE .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1995, 77 (09) :1331-1334
[3]
BARRACK RL, 2001, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V392, P46
[4]
Berger RA, 1998, OPERAT TECH ORTHOP, V8, P128, DOI 10.1016/S1048-6666(98)80022-0
[5]
BERGER RA, 1993, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V286, P40
[6]
BERGER RA, 1998, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V356, P144
[7]
BOLDT JG, 2002, LCS MOBILE BEARING K, P175
[8]
Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty [J].
Bong, MR ;
Di Cesare, PE .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2004, 12 (03) :164-171
[9]
Range of motion after total knee arthroplasty - The effect of implant design and weight-bearing conditions [J].
Dennis, DA ;
Komistek, RD ;
Stiehl, JB ;
Walker, SA ;
Dennis, KN .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1998, 13 (07) :748-752
[10]
ECKHOFF DG, 1995, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V321, P28