Using hearing aid adaptive directional microphones to enhance cochlear implant performance

被引:44
作者
Chung, King [1 ]
Zeng, Fan-Gang [2 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Dept Speech Language & Hearing Sci, W Lafayette, IN 47906 USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
关键词
Cochlear implant; Adaptive; Directional microphone; Hearing aid; Speech recognition; Sound quality; NOISE-REDUCTION ALGORITHMS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; BACKGROUND-NOISE; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.heares.2009.01.005
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
The goal of this study was to investigate whether adaptive microphone directionality could enhance cochlear implant performance. Speech stimuli were created by fitting a digital hearing aid with programmable omnidirectional (OM), fixed directional (FDM), or adaptive directional (ADM) microphones to KEMAR, and recording the hearing aid output in three noise conditions. The first condition simulated a diffused field with noise sources from five stationary locations, whereas the second and third condition represented one or three non-stationary locations in the back hemifield of KEMAR. Speech was always presented to 0 degrees azimuth and the overall signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was +5 dB in the sound field. Eighteen postlingually deafened cochlear implant users listened to the recorded test materials via the direct audio input of their speech processors. Their speech recognition ability and overall sound quality preferences were assessed and the correlation between the amount of noise reduction and the improvement in speech recognition were calculated. The results indicated that ADM yielded significantly better speech recognition scores and overall sound quality preference than FDM and OM in all three noise conditions and the improvement in speech recognition scores was highly correlated with the amount of noise reduction. Factors influencing the noise level are discussed. (c) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 37
页数:11
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Evaluation of a second-order directional microphone hearing aid: I. Speech perception outcomes [J].
Bentler, Ruth ;
Palmer, Catherine ;
Mueller, H. Gustav .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY, 2006, 17 (03) :179-189
[2]  
Bentler Ruth A, 2004, Am J Audiol, V13, P73, DOI 10.1044/1059-0889(2004/010)
[3]  
BERGHE JV, 2005, Patent No. 6888949
[4]   Improving speech intelligibility in background noise with an adaptive directional microphone [J].
Blamey, Peter J. ;
Fiket, Hayley J. ;
Steele, Brenton R. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY, 2006, 17 (07) :519-530
[5]   ANTHROPOMETRIC MANIKIN FOR ACOUSTIC RESEARCH [J].
BURKHARD, MD ;
SACHS, RM .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1975, 58 (01) :214-222
[6]   Using hearing aid directional microphones and noise reduction algorithms to enhance cochlear implant performance [J].
Chung, K ;
Zeng, FG ;
Waltzman, S .
ACOUSTICS RESEARCH LETTERS ONLINE-ARLO, 2004, 5 (02) :56-61
[7]  
Chung King, 2004, Trends Amplif, V8, P83, DOI 10.1177/108471380400800302
[8]   Effects of directional microphone and adaptive multichannel noise reduction algorithm on cochlear implant performance [J].
Chung, King ;
Zeng, Fan-Gang ;
Acker, Kyle N. .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2006, 120 (04) :2216-2227
[9]  
Cord Mary T, 2004, J Am Acad Audiol, V15, P353, DOI 10.3766/jaaa.15.5.3
[10]  
Cord Mary T, 2002, J Am Acad Audiol, V13, P295