CMAQ/CAMx annual 2002 performance evaluation over the eastern US

被引:126
作者
Tesche, T. W.
Morris, Ralph
Tonnesen, Gail
McNally, Dennis
Boylan, James
Brewer, Patricia
机构
[1] Alpine Geophys LLC, Ft Wright, KY 41017 USA
[2] ENVIRON Int Corp, Novato, CA 94945 USA
[3] Univ Calif Riverside, Ctr Environm Res & Technol, Riverside, CA 92521 USA
[4] Georgia Dept Nat Resources, Atlanta, GA 30354 USA
[5] VISTAS Tech Coordinator, Swannanoa, NC 28778 USA
关键词
model evaluation; visibility; CMAQ; CAMx; fine particulate; VISTAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.08.046
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Operational, diagnostic, and comparative evaluations of two one-atmosphere regional models were performed for the full calendar year 2002 in support of regional haze regulatory applications in the eastern US. Using consistent emissions, meteorological and air quality data sets, the community multi-scale air quality and comprehensive air quality model with extensions models were exercised on a nested 36/12 km grid system and evaluated across a broad range of time and space scales for numerous gas-phase and fine particulate species derived from routine and research-grade ambient measurements at six monitoring networks. Performance by both models for speciated fine particulate matter (PM) across the eastern US SO42-) ranged from quite good (e.g., 4 to poor (e.g., soil). For most species, model bias was higher in the winter and lower (usually negative) in the summer suggesting potential issues related to vertical mixing (e.g., too little in winter), temporal allocation of emissions, and/or other model science processes or inputs. These results may be used to (a) guide one-atmosphere model refinements, (b) improve data input preparation procedures, (c) evaluate methods for rigorous, stressful performance testing, and (d) clarify the uncertainty in model estimates for regional haze and PM2.5 control strategy programs. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4906 / 4919
页数:14
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
Abraczinskas M, 2004, 13 AMS JOINT C APPL
[2]   Diagnostic evaluation of numerical air quality models with specialized ambient observations: testing the Community Multiscale Air Quality modeling system (CMAQ) at selected SOS 95 ground sites [J].
Arnold, JR ;
Dennis, RL ;
Tonnesen, GS .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 37 (9-10) :1185-1198
[3]  
BHAVE PV, 2004, 2004 MOD 3 C CHAP HI
[4]  
BINKOWSKI FS, 2003, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V108, P4183, DOI DOI 10.1029/2001JD001409
[5]   PM and light extinction model performance metrics, goals, and criteria for three-dimensional air quality models [J].
Boylan, James W. ;
Russell, Armistead G. .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 40 (26) :4946-4959
[6]   Development of a comprehensive, multiscale "one-atmosphere" modeling system: application to the Southern Appalachian Mountains [J].
Boylan, JW ;
Odman, MT ;
Wilkinson, JG ;
Russell, AG ;
Doty, KG ;
Norris, WB ;
McNider, RT .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2002, 36 (23) :3721-3734
[7]  
BREWER P, 2003, ANN AIR WAST MAN ASS
[8]   Trends in speciated fine particulate matter and visibility across monitoring networks in the southeastern United States [J].
Brewer, PF ;
Adlhoch, JP .
JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2005, 55 (11) :1663-1674
[9]  
Byun D., 1999, Science Algorithms of the EPA Models-3 Community Mutiscale Air Quality Modeling System
[10]  
Carter WPL, 1999, DOCUMENTATION SAPRC, V1