The diagnostic value of SE MRI and DWI of the spine in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, smouldering myeloma and multiple myeloma

被引:66
作者
Dutoit, Julie C. [2 ]
Vanderkerken, Matthias A. [2 ]
Anthonissen, Joris [1 ]
Dochy, Frederick [2 ]
Verstraete, Koenraad L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
Diffusion-weighted imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging; Multiple myeloma; Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance; Diagnosis; APPARENT DIFFUSION-COEFFICIENT; CONTRAST-ENHANCED MRI; BONE-MARROW; PRECURSOR DISEASE; WEIGHTED MRI; DCE-MRI; INSIGHTS; CANCER;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-014-3324-5
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
100231 [临床病理学]; 100902 [航空航天医学];
摘要
To evaluate DWI of the bone marrow in the differentiation of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), smouldering myeloma (SMM) and multiple myeloma (MM). The retrospective study includes 64 patients with MGUS, 27 with SMM, 64 with new MM and 12 controls. Signal intensity (SI) of spinal SE-MRI and DWI (b0-1000) as well as apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) were measured in the T10 and L3. Qualitative assessment of b-images was performed by one experienced radiologist. ADC600 and ADC1000 are the best ADC values in differentiating patient groups (p < 0.030). SIT2, SIb1000 and ADC1000 are higher and SIT1 lower in L3 compared to T10 (p < 0.050). All quantitative parameters of L3 can differentiate significantly between MGUS and MM (p < 0.050) and between patients with percentage plasma cells (PC%) between 0-10 % compared to > 50 % (p = 0.001). Only SIT2 for L3 can differentiate MGUS from SMM (p = 0.044) and PC%0-10 from PC%10-25 (p = 0.033). Qualitative interpretation of b1000 images allows differentiating MM patients from those with MGUS or SMM (p < 0.001). Spinal SE-MRI can differentiate among MGUS, SMM, MM and control subjects. DWI based on the SI on b1000 images and ADC values is increased in MM compared to MGUS and SMM. Qualitative assessment of b-images can differentiate MM from MGUS or SMM. aEuro cent ADC values are higher in patients with MM compared to MGUS aEuro cent DWI parameters change late in disease evolution aEuro cent DWI is sensitive but not specific in diagnosing patients with MM aEuro cent Qualitative DWI assessment is good in detecting myeloma patients.
引用
收藏
页码:2754 / 2765
页数:12
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]
Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Bone Marrow [J].
Dietrich, Olaf ;
Biffar, Andreas ;
Reiser, Maximilian F. ;
Baur-Melnyk, Andrea .
SEMINARS IN MUSCULOSKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2009, 13 (02) :134-144
[2]
Value of whole body MRI and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in the diagnosis, follow-up and evaluation of disease activity and extent in multiple myeloma [J].
Dutoit, Julie C. ;
Vanderkerken, Matthias A. ;
Verstraete, Koenraad L. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 82 (09) :1444-1452
[3]
Early response assessment in patients with multiple myeloma during anti-angiogenic therapy using arterial spin labelling: first clinical results [J].
Fenchel, Michael ;
Konaktchieva, Marina ;
Weisel, Katja ;
Kraus, Sabina ;
Brodoefel, Harald ;
Claussen, Claus D. ;
Horger, Marius .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2010, 20 (12) :2899-2906
[4]
Age-related distribution of vertebral bone-marrow diffusivity [J].
Herrmann, Jochen ;
Krstin, Nina ;
Schoennagel, Bjoern P. ;
Sornsakrin, Marjike ;
Derlin, Thorsten ;
Busch, Jasmin D. ;
Petersen, Kay Uwe ;
Graessner, Joachim ;
Adam, Gerhard ;
Habermann, Christian R. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 81 (12) :4046-4049
[5]
Diffusion-weighted imaging for non-invasive and quantitative monitoring of bone marrow infiltration in patients with monoclonal plasma cell disease: a comparative study with histology [J].
Hillengass, Jens ;
Baeuerle, Tobias ;
Bartl, Reiner ;
Andrulis, Mindaugas ;
McClanahan, Fabienne ;
Laun, Frederik B. ;
Zechmann, Christian Martin ;
Shah, Rajiv ;
Wagner-Gund, Barbara ;
Simon, Dirk ;
Heiss, Christiane ;
Neben, Kai ;
Ho, Anthony D. ;
Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter ;
Goldschmidt, Hartmut ;
Delorme, Stefan ;
Stieltjes, Bram .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2011, 153 (06) :721-728
[6]
Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and diffusion-weighted imaging of bone marrow in healthy individuals [J].
Hillengass, Jens ;
Stieltjes, Bram ;
Baeuerle, Tobias ;
McCianahan, Fabienne ;
Heise, Christiane ;
Hielscher, Thomas ;
Wagner-Gund, Barbara ;
Habetler, Verena ;
Goldschmidt, Hartmut ;
Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter ;
Delorme, Stefan ;
Zechmann, Christian M. .
ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2011, 52 (03) :324-330
[7]
Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in musculoskeletal MRI: a critical review [J].
Khoo, Michael M. Y. ;
Tyler, Philippa A. ;
Saifuddin, Asif ;
Padhani, Anwar R. .
SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2011, 40 (06) :665-681
[8]
Do apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values obtained using high b-values with a 3-T MRI correlate better than a transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsy with true Gleason scores obtained from radical prostatectomy specimens for patients with prostate cancer? [J].
Kitajima, Kazuhiro ;
Takahashi, Satoru ;
Ueno, Yoshiko ;
Miyake, Hideaki ;
Fujisawa, Masato ;
Kawakami, Fumi ;
Sugimura, Kazuro .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 82 (08) :1219-1226
[9]
Koh D M., 2010, Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging Applications in the Body, P33
[10]
Kyle RA, 2003, BRIT J HAEMATOL, V121, P749