Corporate Social Responsibility theories:: Mapping the territory

被引:1722
作者
Garriga, E [1 ]
Melé, DN [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Navarra, IESE Business Sch, Dept Business Eth, Barcelona 08034, Spain
关键词
corporate social responsibility; corporate responsiveness; corporate citizenship; stakeholder management; corporate social performance; issues management; sustainable development; the common good;
D O I
10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039399.90587.34
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) field presents not only a landscape of theories but also a proliferation of approaches, which are controversial, complex and unclear. This article tries to clarify the situation, "mapping the territory'' by classifying the main CSR theories and related approaches in four groups: (1) instrumental theories, in which the corporation is seen as only an instrument for wealth creation, and its social activities are only a means to achieve economic results; (2) political theories, which concern themselves with the power of corporations in society and a responsible use of this power in the political arena; (3) integrative theories, in which the corporation is focused on the satisfaction of social demands; and (4) ethical theories, based on ethical responsibilities of corporations to society. In practice, each CSR theory presents four dimensions related to profits, political performance, social demands and ethical values. The findings suggest the necessity to develop a new theory on the business and society relationship, which should integrate these four dimensions.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 71
页数:21
相关论文
共 151 条
  • [61] Frooman J., 1997, Business Society, V36, P221, DOI DOI 10.1177/000765039703600302
  • [62] SHIFTING PARADIGMS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT - IMPLICATIONS FOR MANAGEMENT THEORY AND RESEARCH
    GLADWIN, TN
    KENNELLY, JJ
    KRAUSE, TS
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1995, 20 (04) : 874 - 907
  • [63] GOODPASTER KE, 1999, INT BUSINESS ETHICS, P151
  • [64] GREENING DW, 1994, ACAD MANAGE J, V37, P467, DOI 10.5465/256697
  • [65] Griffin J.J., 1997, Business and Society, V36, P5, DOI DOI 10.1177/000765039703600102
  • [66] Griffin Jennifer., 2000, Business Society, V39, P479, DOI [DOI 10.1177/000765030003900407, 10.1177/000765030003900407]
  • [67] Harrison J.S., 1996, ACAD MANAGE EXEC, V10, P46, DOI [10.5465/ame.1996.9606161554, DOI 10.5465/AME.1996.9606161554]
  • [68] A NATURAL-RESOURCE-BASED VIEW OF THE FIRM
    HART, SL
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1995, 20 (04) : 986 - 1014
  • [69] Hart SL, 2002, MIT SLOAN MANAGE REV, V44, P51
  • [70] HEALD M, 1988, SOCIAL RESPONSIBILIT