Random effects logistic models for analysing efficacy of a longitudinal randomized treatment with non-adherence

被引:29
作者
Small, Dylan S.
Ten Have, Thomas R.
Joffe, Marshall M.
Cheng, Jing
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Dept Stat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Dept Biostat & Epidemiol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
random effects; logistic regression; exclusion restriction; encouragement studies; mental health;
D O I
10.1002/sim.2313
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We present a random effects logistic approach for estimating the efficacy of treatment for compliers in a randomized trial with treatment non-adherence and longitudinal binary outcomes. We use our approach to analyse a primary care depression intervention trial. The use of a random effects model to estimate efficacy supplements intent-to-treat longitudinal analyses based on random effects logistic models that are commonly used in primary care depression research. Our estimation approach is an extension of Nagelkerke et al's instrumental variables approximation for cross-sectional binary outcomes. Our approach is easily implementable with standard random effects logistic regression software. We show through a simulation study that our approach provides reasonably accurate inferences for the setting of the depression trial under model assumptions. We also evaluate the sensitivity of our approach to model assumptions for the depression trial. Copyright (c) 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1981 / 2007
页数:27
相关论文
共 53 条