A paradigm too far? A dynamic stability reconsideration of the social network research program

被引:145
作者
Kilduff, Martin [1 ]
Tsai, Wenpin
Hanke, Ralph
机构
[1] Univ Texas, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[3] Bowling Green State Univ, Bowling Green, OH 43403 USA
关键词
D O I
10.5465/AMR.2006.22528168
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Instead of paradigmatic unity. we call for progressive theory development from a set of core concepts (Lakatos, 1970) comprising primacy of relations, ubiquity of embeddedness. social utility of connections, and structural patterning of social life. Organizational network research can capture complexity and distinctiveness of individuals and networks in terms of mutual constitution and change. The goal is not to delineate small puzzles whose outcomes are predetermined but to signal bold ideas concerning new phenomena.
引用
收藏
页码:1031 / 1048
页数:18
相关论文
共 135 条
[1]  
ANDREWS SB, 1999, RES SOCIOLOGY ORG, V16
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, BLACKWELL COMPANION, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781405164061.CH2
[3]  
Archer M., 1996, CULTURE AGENCY PLACE
[4]  
AYER AJ, 1936, LANGUAGE TRUTH LOGI
[5]  
Baert P., 1998, SOCIAL THEORY 20 CEN
[6]  
Baker Wayne E., 1999, CORPORATE SOCIAL CAP
[7]  
Baker WayneE., 2002, BLACKWELL COMPANION, P520
[8]   The ties that lead: A social network approach to leadership [J].
Balkundi, P ;
Kilduff, M .
LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2005, 16 (06) :941-961
[9]   Emergence of scaling in random networks [J].
Barabási, AL ;
Albert, R .
SCIENCE, 1999, 286 (5439) :509-512
[10]  
BARBER B, 1995, SOC RES, V62, P387