A paradigm too far? A dynamic stability reconsideration of the social network research program

被引:145
作者
Kilduff, Martin [1 ]
Tsai, Wenpin
Hanke, Ralph
机构
[1] Univ Texas, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[3] Bowling Green State Univ, Bowling Green, OH 43403 USA
关键词
D O I
10.5465/AMR.2006.22528168
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Instead of paradigmatic unity. we call for progressive theory development from a set of core concepts (Lakatos, 1970) comprising primacy of relations, ubiquity of embeddedness. social utility of connections, and structural patterning of social life. Organizational network research can capture complexity and distinctiveness of individuals and networks in terms of mutual constitution and change. The goal is not to delineate small puzzles whose outcomes are predetermined but to signal bold ideas concerning new phenomena.
引用
收藏
页码:1031 / 1048
页数:18
相关论文
共 135 条
[21]   Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective [J].
Brass, DJ ;
Galaskiewicz, J ;
Greve, HR ;
Tsai, WP .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2004, 47 (06) :795-817
[22]   A tool kit for practice theory (Analysis of correspondence, techniques) [J].
Breiger, RL .
POETICS, 2000, 27 (2-3) :91-115
[23]   Nostalgia and the narrativization of identity: A Turkish case study [J].
Brown, AD ;
Humphreys, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2002, 13 (02) :141-159
[24]  
Bryson Gladys, 1945, Man and Society: The Scottish Inquiry of the Eighteenth
[25]   MARXISM AS SCIENCE - HISTORICAL CHALLENGES AND THEORETICAL GROWTH [J].
BURAWOY, M .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1990, 55 (06) :775-793
[26]  
Burns T., 1961, The management of innovation
[27]  
Burrell G., 1979, Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis: Elements of the Sociology of Corporate Life
[28]  
Burt R.S, 2005, Brokerage and Closure. An Introduction to Social Capital
[29]  
Burt R. S., 2001, Networks and markets, P30
[30]   The network structure of social capital [J].
Burt, RS .
RESEARCH IN ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, VOL 22, 2000: AN ANNUAL SERIES OF ANALYTICAL ESSAYS AND CRITICAL REVIEWS, 2000, 22 :345-423