Impact of cochlear implants on the functional health status of older adults

被引:148
作者
Francis, HW
Chee, N
Yeagle, J
Cheng, A
Niparko, JK
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, JHOC, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] Advisory Board Co, Washington, DC USA
[3] Tan Tock Seng Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
cochlear implantation; elderly; cost-utility; speech perception; quality of life;
D O I
10.1097/00005537-200208000-00028
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objectives: To assess the impact of cochlear implantation on quality of life changes in older adults aged 50 years and above. Study Design: Retrospective study by questionnaire and chart review. Methods: Forty-seven patients aged 50 to 80 years (mean age, 63.4 y [SD = 8.6 y]), who have multiple-channel cochlear implants received at The Listening Center at Johns Hopkins Hospital, completed the Ontario Health Utilities Index Mark 3 survey and a questionnaire on quality of life changes. Health utility scores before and after cochlear implantation were measured, and audiologic data before implantation and at 6 months and 1 year after implantation were analyzed. Results: Cochlear implantation in older adults is associated with a mean gain in health utility (P < .0001) of 0.24 (SD = 0.33), which corresponds to a favorable cost-utility of $9530 per quality-adjusted life-year. Improvements in hearing and emotional health attributes were primarily responsible for this increase in health-related quality of life measure. There was a significant increase in speech perception scores at 6 months after surgery (P < .0001 for both CID sentence and monosyllabic word tests) and a strong correlation between the magnitude of health utility gains and the postoperative increase in speech perception scores (r = 0.45, P < .05). Conclusions: Cochlear implants have a significant impact on the quality of life of older deaf patients, and are a cost-effective intervention in this population. Improvements in speech perception are predictive of gains in health-related quality of life and associated emotional benefits after cochlear implantation.
引用
收藏
页码:1482 / 1488
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   The effectiveness of cost-effectiveness analysis in containing costs [J].
Azimi, NA ;
Welch, HG .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1998, 13 (10) :664-669
[2]   RELIABILITY OF THE HEALTH UTILITIES INDEX - MARK-III USED IN THE 1991 CYCLE-6 CANADIAN GENERAL SOCIAL SURVEY HEALTH QUESTIONNAIRE [J].
BOYLE, MH ;
FURLONG, W ;
FEENY, D ;
TORRANCE, GW ;
HATCHER, J .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1995, 4 (03) :249-257
[3]  
Buchman C A, 1999, Ear Nose Throat J, V78, P489
[4]   Quality of life determinants and hearing function in an elderly population: Osservatorio Geriatrico Campano Study Group [J].
Cacciatore, F ;
Napoli, C ;
Abete, P ;
Marciano, E ;
Triassi, M ;
Rengo, F .
GERONTOLOGY, 1999, 45 (06) :323-328
[5]  
Campbell V A, 1999, MMWR CDC Surveill Summ, V48, P131
[6]   Cost-utility of the cochlear implant in adults -: A meta-analysis [J].
Cheng, AK ;
Niparko, JK .
ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 1999, 125 (11) :1214-1218
[7]   Cost-utility analysis of the cochlear implant in children [J].
Cheng, AK ;
Rubin, HR ;
Powe, NR ;
Mellon, NK ;
Francis, HW ;
Niparko, JK .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 284 (07) :850-856
[8]  
CHENG AK, 2000, THESIS J HOKINS U, P160
[9]  
*DEP HLTH HUM SERV, 1982, HEAR AB PERS SOC HLT
[10]  
Facer G W, 1995, Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl, V166, P187