Addition of montelukast or salmeterol to fluticasone for protection against asthma attacks: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study

被引:52
作者
Ilowite, J
Webb, R
Friedman, B
Kerwin, E
Bird, SR
Hustad, CM
Edelman, JM
机构
[1] Winthrop Univ Hosp, Div Pulm & Crit Care, Mineola, NY 11501 USA
[2] Allergy & Asthma Associates, Kirkland, WA USA
[3] Allergy Asthma Bronchitis & Immunol Associates, Fountain Valley, CA USA
[4] Clin Res Inst So Oregon LLC, Medford, OR USA
[5] Merck & Co Inc, West Point, PA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61430-5
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: For patients whose asthma is uncontrolled with low-dose inhaled corticosteroids, addition of alternative therapy instead of increasing the steroid dose is recommended by current treatment guidelines. Objective: To compare montelukast, a once-daily leukotriene receptor antagonist, and salmeterol, a twice-daily, long-acting beta-agonist, concomitantly administered with inhaled fluticasone, according to the percentage of patients without an asthma attack for 1 year. Methods: A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter study was conducted. Adult patients with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma (ages 14-73 years) receiving inhaled fluticasone (220 mug/d) who remained symptomatic during a 4-week run-in period were randomized to the addition of salmeterol (84 mug/d) or montelukast (10 mg/d) for 48 weeks. Results: Of the 1,473 randomized patients, 743 were randomized to montelukast and 730 to salmeterol; 1,059 patients completed the study. Eighty percent of patients in the montelukast group and 83.3% of patients in the salmeterol group remained attack free during the 48 weeks of treatment (relative risk, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.96-1.49). Montelukast significantly reduced blood eosinophil counts compared with salmeterol, whereas salmeterol significantly increased prealbuterol forced expiratory volume in 1 second, asthma-specific quality of life, morning peak expiratory flow rate, and decreased nocturnal awakenings compared with montelukast. Differences between treatments were small, and both treatments were generally well tolerated. Conclusions: Addition of montelukast or salmeterol to an inhaled corticosteroid similarly protected most patients from experiencing an asthma attack during a 1-year period, but, based on noninferiority limits, the study was inconclusive with regard to a difference between treatment groups.
引用
收藏
页码:641 / 648
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[21]   Inhaled corticosteroids and bone density [J].
Lipworth, BJ .
LANCET, 2000, 356 (9227) :425-425
[22]   Systemic adverse effects of inhaled corticosteroid therapy - A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Lipworth, BJ .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1999, 159 (09) :941-955
[23]   Randomised, placebo controlled trial of effect of a leukotriene receptor antagonist, montelukast, on tapering inhaled corticosteroids in asthmatic patients [J].
Löfdahl, CG ;
Reiss, TF ;
Leff, JA ;
Israel, E ;
Noonan, MJ ;
Finn, AF ;
Seidenberg, BC ;
Capizzi, T ;
Kundu, S ;
Godard, P .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 319 (7202) :87-90
[24]  
Malmstrom K., 1998, European Respiratory Journal, V12, p19s
[25]   Fluticasone propionate/salmeterol combination provides more effective asthma control than low-dose inhaled corticosteroid plus montelukast [J].
Nelson, HS ;
Busse, WW ;
Kerwin, E ;
Church, N ;
Emmett, A ;
Rickard, K ;
Knobil, K .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2000, 106 (06) :1088-1095
[26]  
Newcombe RG, 1998, STAT MED, V17, P873, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980430)17:8<873::AID-SIM779>3.0.CO
[27]  
2-I
[28]   SUBSENSITIVITY OF BRONCHODILATOR AND SYSTEMIC BETA(2) ADRENOCEPTOR RESPONSES AFTER REGULAR TWICE-DAILY TREATMENT WITH EFORMOTEROL DRY POWDER IN ASTHMATIC-PATIENTS [J].
NEWNHAM, DM ;
GROVE, A ;
MCDEVITT, DG ;
LIPWORTH, BJ .
THORAX, 1995, 50 (05) :497-504
[29]  
*NIH NAT HEART LUN, 2003, GLOB IN ASTHM POCK G
[30]   Effect of inhaled formoterol and budesonide on exacerbations of asthma [J].
Pauwels, RA ;
Lofdahl, CG ;
Postma, DS ;
Tattersfield, AE ;
OByrne, P ;
Barnes, PJ ;
Ullman, A .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1997, 337 (20) :1405-1411