Colonoscopy completion and complication rates in a community gastroenterology practice

被引:144
作者
Rathgaber, Scott W. [1 ]
Wick, Theresa M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Gundersen Lutheran Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol, La Crosse, WI 54601 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2006.03.014
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: In the United States, colonoscopy completion and complication rates are rarely reported outside academic institutions. Increased transparency of quality measures and outcomes is being driven by professional societies, government agencies, and private enterprise. Objective: To collect and report the completion and complication rates of colonoscopy in a community gastroenterology practice. Design: Single-center study, prospective for completion, retrospective for complications. Setting: Community gastroenterology group practice, conducted from August 2002 through December 2004. Patients: A total of 12,407 consecutive patients referred for colonoscopy; mean age, 59.7 years; 5925 men. Interventions: Polypectomy and cautery were completed as indicated. Main Outcome Measures: Completion of colonoscopy to cecum or ileocolonic anastomosis. Complications of hemorrhage and perforation. Results: A colonoscopy was completed in 98.4% of patients. Polypectomy was accomplished in 5074 (40.9%). Polyps occurred more often in men (46.4% vs 35.8%, P < .001). Causes for failure included difficult anatomy (55.9%), inadequate preparation (20.8%), obstructing malignancy (8.6%), discomfort (8.1%), and severe inflammation (6.1%). Failure from difficult anatomy was more likely in women (1-19% vs 0.56%, P < .001). Hemorrhage requiring hospitalization occurred after 25 cases (0.20%). Twenty-three episodes of bleeding occurred after polypectomy (0.46%) and 2 after treatment of arteriovenous malformations. Two perforations occurred (0.016%). One patient developed a posterior circulation stroke. No deaths occurred. Limitations: Completion not independently verifiable. Complications were collected retrospectively. Conclusions: Colonoscopy completion and complication rates in this community gastroenterology practice compared favorably with U.S. academic centers. Endoscopic quality in community practices can meet published outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:556 / 562
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]
American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1995, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V42, P620
[2]
Factors that predict incomplete colonoscopy: Thinner is not always better [J].
Anderson, JC ;
Gonzalez, JD ;
Messina, CR ;
Pollack, BJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2000, 95 (10) :2784-2787
[3]
Endoscopic perforation of the colon: Lessons from a 10-year study [J].
Anderson, ML ;
Pasha, TM ;
Leighton, JA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2000, 95 (12) :3418-3422
[4]
[Anonymous], 2000, Gastrointest Endosc, V52, P827
[5]
[Anonymous], 1999, Gastrintest Endosc
[6]
A novel tableted purgative for colonoscopic preparation: efficacy and safety comparisons with Colyte and Fleet Phospho-Soda [J].
Aronchick, CA ;
Lipshutz, WH ;
Wright, SH ;
Dufrayne, F ;
Bergman, G .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 52 (03) :346-352
[7]
A prospective study of factors that determine cecal intubation time at colonoscopy [J].
Bernstein, C ;
Thorn, M ;
Monsees, K ;
Spell, R ;
O'Connor, JB .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2005, 61 (01) :72-75
[8]
A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow? [J].
Bowles, CJA ;
Leicester, R ;
Romaya, C ;
Swarbrick, E ;
Williams, CB ;
Epstein, O .
GUT, 2004, 53 (02) :277-283
[9]
AGA Task Force on Quality in Practice: A national overview and implications for GI practice [J].
Brotman, M ;
Allen, JI ;
Bickston, SJ ;
Campbell, DR ;
Huddleston, JM ;
Peterson, LE ;
Schoenfeld, PS ;
Sennett, CS ;
Willis, JR .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2005, 129 (01) :361-369
[10]
Is routine ileoscopy useful? An observational study of procedure times, diagnostic yield, and learning curve [J].
Cherian, S ;
Singh, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 99 (12) :2324-2329