Monopoly Versioning of Information Goods When Consumers Have Group Tastes

被引:34
作者
Wei, Xueqi [1 ]
Nault, Barrie R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Sch Management, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Calgary, Haskayne Sch Business, Calgary, AB, Canada
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
information goods; market segmentation; product differentiation; versioning strategies; pricing strategies; PRODUCT; DIFFERENTIATION; COMPETITION; ADOPTION; PIRACY;
D O I
10.1111/poms.12180
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Large sunk costs of development, negligible costs of reproduction, and distribution resulting in economies of scale distinguish information goods from physical goods. Versioning is a way firms may take advantage of these properties. However, in a baseline model where consumers differ in their tastes for quality, an information goods monopolist only offers one version, and this differs from what we observe in practice. We explore formulations that add features to the baseline model that result in a monopolist offering multiple versions. We examine versioning where consumers differ in individual tastes for quality, and groups of consumers that share the same group taste are delineated by segments of individual tastes. We find that if groups have mutually exclusive characteristics-a horizontal dimension-that they value relative to the shared characteristics, then versioning is optimal. Consequently, any horizontal differentiation in product line design favors versioning. In addition, when group tastes are hierarchical such that higher taste groups value characteristics that lower taste groups value but not vice versa-a vertical dimension-as long as the valuations of the higher and adjacent lower taste group are sufficiently close, then versioning is also optimal. Our conditions, which also help determine how many versions are optimal, are based on exogenously defined parameters so that it is feasible to check them in practice.
引用
收藏
页码:1067 / 1081
页数:15
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, INFORM RULES
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1991, Game Theory
[3]  
[Anonymous], WORKING PAPER
[4]   Bundling information goods: Pricing, profits, and efficiency [J].
Bakos, Y ;
Brynjolfsson, E .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1999, 45 (12) :1613-1630
[5]   When is versioning optimal for information goods? [J].
Bhargava, Hemant K. ;
Choudhary, Vidyanand .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2008, 54 (05) :1029-1035
[6]   Information goods and vertical differentiation [J].
Bhargava, HK ;
Choudhary, V .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2001, 18 (02) :89-106
[7]   Product line engineering:: The state of the practice [J].
Birk, A ;
Heller, G ;
John, I ;
Schmid, K ;
von der Massen, T ;
Müller, K .
IEEE SOFTWARE, 2003, 20 (06) :52-+
[8]   Brand-specific tastes for quality [J].
Bonatti, Alessandro .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2011, 29 (05) :562-575
[9]  
Canoy M, 1997, J IND ECON, V45, P305
[10]   MULTIDIMENSIONAL PRODUCT DIFFERENTIATION AND PRICE-COMPETITION [J].
CAPLIN, AS ;
NALEBUFF, BJ .
OXFORD ECONOMIC PAPERS-NEW SERIES, 1986, 38 :129-145