Small dose midazolam or droperidol reduces the hypnotic dose of propofol at the induction of anaesthesia

被引:16
作者
Adachi, YU [1 ]
Uchihashi, Y [1 ]
Watanabe, K [1 ]
Satoh, T [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Def Med Coll, Dept Anesthesiol, Tokorozawa, Saitama 359, Japan
关键词
anaesthetics; intravenous; propofol; dissociative; ketamine; benzodiazepines; midazolam; butyrophenones; droperidol; drug interactions; drug synergism;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2346.2000.00624.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
We investigated the effect of a small dose of midazolam, ketamine, droperidol or lidocaine on the propofol dose required for hypnosis during induction of general anaesthesia. These drugs were randomly administered to 100 patients about to undergo scheduled surgery. Propofol was then infused at a rate of 250 mu g kg(-1) min(-1) and the hypnotic dose to produce hypnosis was evaluated. Midazolam (20 mu g kg(-1)) and droperidol (20 mu g kg(-1)) significantly reduced the mean hypnotic dose of propofol (mean) S.D.) compared with the placebo (43.7 +/- 17.8 mg, 61.9 +/- 10.6 mg and 72.5 +/- 27.7 mg after pretreatment with midazolam, droperidol and placebo, respectively), whereas ketamine (0.1 mg kg(-1)) and lidocaine (1 mg kg(-1)) did not significantly affect the hypnotic dose of propofol (63.1 +/- 25.6 mg and 65.1 +/- 24.8 mg, respectively). Only midazolam when compared with saline administration, (176 +/- 66 s and 298 +/- 126 s, respectively), shortened the time to achieve hypnosis. The changes in blood pressure (non-invasive) and heart rate were not significantly different in all groups during the induction of anaesthesia and oro-tracheal intubation. These results raise the possibility that new combinations of central nervous system drugs, such as droperidol and propofol, have a potential to reduce the dose of intravenous anaesthetics, including propofol, that produce hypnosis without significant adverse effects.
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 131
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
BOREEAT A, 1992, ANESTH ANALG, V74, P539
[2]  
BORGEAT A, 1994, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V80, P642
[3]   Antiemetic effect of subhypnotic doses of propofol after thyroidectomy [J].
Ewalenko, P ;
Janny, S ;
Dejonckheere, M ;
Andry, G ;
Wyns, C .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1996, 77 (04) :463-467
[4]   Propofol versus propofol-ketamine sedation for retrobulbar nerve block: Comparison of sedation quality, intraocular pressure changes, and recovery profiles [J].
Frey, K ;
Sukhani, R ;
Pawlowski, J ;
Pappas, AL ;
Mikat-Stevens, M ;
Slogoff, S .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1999, 89 (02) :317-321
[5]  
GIT JBM, 1991, ANAESTHESIA, V46, P24
[6]   ADDITIVE INTERACTIONS BETWEEN PROPOFOL AND KETAMINE WHEN USED FOR ANESTHESIA INDUCTION IN FEMALE-PATIENTS [J].
HUI, TW ;
SHORT, TG ;
HONG, W ;
SUEN, T ;
GIN, T ;
PLUMMER, J .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1995, 82 (03) :641-648
[7]   EXCITATORY AMINO-ACID RECEPTORS, 2ND MESSENGERS AND REGULATION OF INTRACELLULAR CA-2+ IN MAMMALIAN NEURONS [J].
MAYER, ML ;
MILLER, RJ .
TRENDS IN PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1990, 11 (06) :254-260
[8]  
MCKAY A C, 1991, British Journal of Anaesthesia, V67, P1, DOI 10.1093/bja/67.1.1
[9]   The effects of midazolam on propofol-induced anesthesia: Propofol dose requirements, mood profiles, and perioperative dreams [J].
Oxorn, DC ;
Ferris, LE ;
Harrington, E ;
Orser, BA .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1997, 85 (03) :553-559
[10]  
Pathak D, 1990, J Clin Anesth, V2, P81, DOI 10.1016/0952-8180(90)90058-B