Small dose midazolam or droperidol reduces the hypnotic dose of propofol at the induction of anaesthesia

被引:16
作者
Adachi, YU [1 ]
Uchihashi, Y [1 ]
Watanabe, K [1 ]
Satoh, T [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Def Med Coll, Dept Anesthesiol, Tokorozawa, Saitama 359, Japan
关键词
anaesthetics; intravenous; propofol; dissociative; ketamine; benzodiazepines; midazolam; butyrophenones; droperidol; drug interactions; drug synergism;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2346.2000.00624.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
We investigated the effect of a small dose of midazolam, ketamine, droperidol or lidocaine on the propofol dose required for hypnosis during induction of general anaesthesia. These drugs were randomly administered to 100 patients about to undergo scheduled surgery. Propofol was then infused at a rate of 250 mu g kg(-1) min(-1) and the hypnotic dose to produce hypnosis was evaluated. Midazolam (20 mu g kg(-1)) and droperidol (20 mu g kg(-1)) significantly reduced the mean hypnotic dose of propofol (mean) S.D.) compared with the placebo (43.7 +/- 17.8 mg, 61.9 +/- 10.6 mg and 72.5 +/- 27.7 mg after pretreatment with midazolam, droperidol and placebo, respectively), whereas ketamine (0.1 mg kg(-1)) and lidocaine (1 mg kg(-1)) did not significantly affect the hypnotic dose of propofol (63.1 +/- 25.6 mg and 65.1 +/- 24.8 mg, respectively). Only midazolam when compared with saline administration, (176 +/- 66 s and 298 +/- 126 s, respectively), shortened the time to achieve hypnosis. The changes in blood pressure (non-invasive) and heart rate were not significantly different in all groups during the induction of anaesthesia and oro-tracheal intubation. These results raise the possibility that new combinations of central nervous system drugs, such as droperidol and propofol, have a potential to reduce the dose of intravenous anaesthetics, including propofol, that produce hypnosis without significant adverse effects.
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 131
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[11]   EFFECT OF DIFFERENT RATES OF INFUSION OF PROPOFOL FOR INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA IN ELDERLY PATIENTS [J].
PEACOCK, JE ;
LEWIS, RP ;
REILLY, CS ;
NIMMO, WS .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1990, 65 (03) :346-352
[12]  
Ræder JC, 1998, ACTA ANAESTH SCAND, V42, P106
[13]  
Roden D. M., 1996, PHARMACOL BASIS THER, P839
[14]   HYPNOTIC AND ANESTHETIC INTERACTIONS BETWEEN MIDAZOLAM, PROPOFOL AND ALFENTANIL [J].
SHORT, TG ;
PLUMMER, JL ;
CHUI, PT .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1992, 69 (02) :162-167
[15]   PROPOFOL AND MIDAZOLAM ACT SYNERGISTICALLY IN COMBINATION [J].
SHORT, TG ;
CHUI, PT .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1991, 67 (05) :539-545
[16]   Prophylactic antiemetics for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Ondansetron versus droperidol plus metoclopramide [J].
Steinbrook, RA ;
Freiberger, D ;
Gosnell, JL ;
Brooks, DC .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1996, 83 (05) :1081-1083
[17]  
STOKES DN, 1991, ANESTH ANALG, V72, P578
[18]   Pain on injection of propofol [J].
Tan, CH ;
Onsiong, MK .
ANAESTHESIA, 1998, 53 (05) :468-476
[19]   PHARMACOKINETIC INTERACTIONS BETWEEN MIDAZOLAM AND PROPOFOL - AN INFUSION STUDY [J].
TEH, J ;
SHORT, TG ;
WONG, J ;
TAN, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1994, 72 (01) :62-65
[20]  
WAGNER BKJ, 1994, PHARMACOTHERAPY, V14, P586