Clinical interpretation and use of stroke scales

被引:774
作者
Kasner, SE [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Med Ctr, Dept Neurol, Comprehens Stroke Ctr, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70495-1
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
No single outcome measure can describe or predict all dimensions of recovery and disability after acute stroke. Several scales have proven reliability and validity in stroke trials, including the National Institutes of Health stroke scale (NIHSS), the modified Rankin scale (mRS), the Barthel index (BI), the Glasgow outcome scale (GOS), and the stroke impact scale (SIS). Several scales have been combined in stroke trials to derive a global statistic to better define the effect of acute interventions, although this composite statistic is not clinically tenable. In practice, the NIHSS is useful for early prognostication and serial assessment, whereas the BI is useful for planning rehabilitative strategies. The mRS and GO S provide summary measures of outcome and might be most relevant to clinicians and patients considering early intervention. The SIS was designed to measure the patient's perspective on the effect of stroke. Familiarity with these scales could improve clinicians' interpretation of stroke research and their clinical decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:603 / 612
页数:10
相关论文
共 69 条
[51]   Relationship between ischemic lesion volume and functional status in the 2nd week after middle cerebral artery stroke [J].
Schiemanck, SK ;
Post, MWM ;
Witkamp, TD ;
Kappelle, LJ ;
Prevo, AJH .
NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2005, 19 (02) :133-138
[52]   Prediction of hospital disposition after thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [J].
Schlegel, D ;
Tanne, D ;
Demchuk, AM ;
Levine, SR ;
Kasner, SE .
ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 2004, 61 (07) :1061-1064
[53]   Utility of the NIH stroke scale as a predictor of hospital disposition [J].
Schlegel, D ;
Kolb, SJ ;
Luciano, JM ;
Tovar, JM ;
Cucchiara, BL ;
Liebeskind, DS ;
Kasner, SE .
STROKE, 2003, 34 (01) :134-137
[54]  
SHINAR D, 1987, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V68, P723
[55]   Modified rankin scale with expanded guidance scheme and interview questionnaire: Interrater agreement and reproducibility of assessment [J].
Shinohara, Y ;
Minematsu, K ;
Amano, T ;
Ohashi, Y .
CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2006, 21 (04) :271-278
[56]   The Barthel activities of daily living index: Self-reporting versus actual performance in the old-old (>= 75 years) [J].
Sinoff, G ;
Ore, L .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1997, 45 (07) :832-836
[57]  
Streiner DL, 1995, PRACTICAL GUIDE THEI, P111
[58]   Use of the Barthel Index and Modified Rankin Scale in acute stroke trials [J].
Sulter, G ;
Steen, C ;
De Keyser, J .
STROKE, 1999, 30 (08) :1538-1541
[59]   Use of a global test for multiple outcomes in stroke trials with application to the national institute of neurological disorders and stroke t-PA stroke trial [J].
Tilley, BC ;
Marler, J ;
Geller, NL ;
Lu, M ;
Legler, J ;
Brott, T ;
Lyden, P ;
Grotta, J .
STROKE, 1996, 27 (11) :2136-2142
[60]   Shortening the NIH Stroke Scale for use in the prehospital setting [J].
Tirschwell, DL ;
Longstreth, WT ;
Becker, KJ ;
Gammans, RE ;
Sabounjian, LA ;
Hamilton, S ;
Morgenstern, LB .
STROKE, 2002, 33 (12) :2801-2806