Seed plant phylogeny inferred from all three plant genomes: Monophyly of extant gymnosperms and origin of Gnetales from conifers

被引:362
作者
Chaw, SM
Parkinson, CL
Cheng, YC
Vincent, TM
Palmer, JD
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Dept Biol, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[2] Acad Sinica, Inst Bot, Taipei 11529, Taiwan
关键词
D O I
10.1073/pnas.97.8.4086
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Phylogenetic relationships among the five groups of extant seed plants are presently quite unclear. For example, morphological studies consistently identify the Gnetales as the extant sister group to angiosperms (the so-called "anthophyte" hypothesis), whereas a number of molecular studies recover gymnosperm monophyly, and few agree with the morphology-based placement of Gnetales. To better resolve these and other unsettled issues, we have generated a new molecular data set of mitochondrial small subunit rRNA sequences, and have analyzed these data together with comparable data sets for the nuclear small subunit rRNA gene and the chloroplast rbcL gene. All nuclear analyses strongly ally Gnetales with a monophyletic conifers, whereas all mitochondrial analyses and those chloroplast analyses that take into account saturation of third-codon position transitions actually place Gnetales within conifers, as the sister group to the Pinaceae, Combined analyses of all three genes strongly support this latter relationship, which to our knowledge has never been suggested before, The combined analyses also strongly support monophyly of extant gymnosperms, with cycads identified as the basal-most group of gymnosperms, Ginkgo as the next basal, and all conifers except for Pinaceae as sister to the Gnetales + Pinaceae clade. According to these findings, the Gnetales may be viewed as extremely divergent conifers, and the many morphological similarities between angiosperms and Gnetales (e.g., double fertilization and flower-like reproductive structures) arose independently.
引用
收藏
页码:4086 / 4091
页数:6
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [31] The earliest angiosperms: evidence from mitochondrial, plastid and nuclear genomes
    Qiu, YL
    Lee, JH
    Bernasconi-Quadroni, F
    Soltis, DE
    Soltis, PS
    Zanis, M
    Zimmer, EA
    Chen, ZD
    Savolainen, V
    Chase, MW
    [J]. NATURE, 1999, 402 (6760) : 404 - 407
  • [32] The gain of three mitochondrial introns identifies liverworts as the earliest land plants
    Qiu, YL
    Cho, YR
    Cox, JC
    Palmer, JD
    [J]. NATURE, 1998, 394 (6694) : 671 - 674
  • [33] CHLOROPLAST DNA EVIDENCE ON THE ANCIENT EVOLUTIONARY SPLIT IN VASCULAR LAND PLANTS
    RAUBESON, LA
    JANSEN, RK
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1992, 255 (5052) : 1697 - 1699
  • [34] A RARE CHLOROPLAST-DNA STRUCTURAL MUTATION IS SHARED BY ALL CONIFERS
    RAUBESON, LA
    JANSEN, RK
    [J]. BIOCHEMICAL SYSTEMATICS AND ECOLOGY, 1992, 20 (01) : 17 - 24
  • [35] RAUBESON LA, 2000, IN PRESS AM J BOT
  • [36] LIGNOPHYTE PHYLOGENY AND THE EVOLUTION OF SPERMATOPHYTES - A NUMERICAL CLADISTIC-ANALYSIS
    ROTHWELL, GW
    SERBET, R
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC BOTANY, 1994, 19 (03) : 443 - 482
  • [37] Molecular data from the chloroplast rpoC1 gene suggest deep and distinct dichotomy of contemporary spermatophytes into two monophyla:: Gymnosperms (including Gnetales) and angiosperms
    Samigullin, TK
    Martin, WF
    Troitsky, AV
    Antonov, AS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR EVOLUTION, 1999, 49 (03) : 310 - 315
  • [38] Sequence peculiarity of gnetalean legumin-like seed storage proteins
    Shutov, AD
    Braun, H
    Chesnokov, YV
    Horstmann, C
    Kakhovskaya, IA
    Bäumlein, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR EVOLUTION, 1998, 47 (04) : 486 - 492
  • [39] The phylogeny of land plants inferred from 18S rDNA sequences: Pushing the limits of rDNA signal?
    Soltis, PS
    Soltis, DE
    Wolf, PG
    Nickrent, DL
    Chaw, S
    Chapman, RL
    [J]. MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 1999, 16 (12) : 1774 - 1784
  • [40] Phylogenetic relationships of conifers inferred from partial 28S rRNA gene sequences
    Stefanovic, S
    Jager, M
    Deutsch, J
    Broutin, J
    Masselot, M
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 1998, 85 (05) : 688 - 697