Continuous extradural infusion of ropivacaine 2 mg ml(-1) for pain relief during labour

被引:17
作者
Benhamou, D
Hamza, J
Eledjam, JJ
Dailland, P
Palot, M
Seebacher, J
Milon, D
Heeroma, K
机构
[1] HOP ST VINCENT DE PAUL,DEPT ANESTHESIE,F-75014 PARIS,FRANCE
[2] CHU NIMES,DEPT ANESTHESIE,CTR GASTON DOUMERGUE,F-30006 NIMES,FRANCE
[3] GRP HOSP COCHIN,DEPT ANESTHESIE,F-75014 PARIS,FRANCE
[4] CHRU REIMS,HOP ROBERT DEBRE,F-51092 REIMS,FRANCE
[5] HOP LA PITIE SALPETRIERE,DEPT ANESTHESIE,F-75013 PARIS,FRANCE
[6] HOP SUD,DEPT ANESTHESIE,F-35056 RENNES,FRANCE
[7] ASTRA PAIN CONTROL,SODERTALJE,SWEDEN
关键词
anaesthesia; obstetric; anaesthetics local; ropivacaine; analgesia; analgesic techniques; extradural;
D O I
10.1093/bja/78.6.748
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
We have assessed the dose-response relationship of a solution of ropivacaine 2 mg ml(-1), given as a continuous extradural infusion to women in labour. A total of 133 parturients were allocated randomly to one of four groups to receive a fixed rate ropivacaine infusion of 4, 6, 8 or 10 ml h(-1) with additional bolus doses as necessary. Contraction pain, quality of analgesia, sensory block, motor block and neonatal Apgar scores were assessed. There were no significant differences between groups in terms of analgesia or motor block, although significantly more bolus doses were required by the group receiving 4 ml h(-1) (P < 0.05 compared with the other groups), and a significantly higher total dose of ropivacaine was administered to the 10-ml h(-1) group compared with the 6-ml h(-1) group (P = 0.044). There were no significant differences between groups in terms of obstetric or neonatal outcome. We conclude that ropivacaine 2 mg ml(-1) was effective and well tolerated when given as a continuous extradural infusion at 6-8 ml h(-1) and may be used as the sole analgesic during labour.
引用
收藏
页码:748 / 750
页数:3
相关论文
共 5 条
[1]   CLINICAL EFFECTS AND MATERNAL AND FETAL PLASMA-CONCENTRATION OF EPIDURAL ROPIVACAINE VERSUS BUPIVACAINE FOR CESAREAN-SECTION [J].
DATTA, S ;
CAMANN, W ;
BADER, A ;
VANDERBURGH, L .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1995, 82 (06) :1346-1352
[2]   A double-blind comparison of 0.25 % ropivacaine and 0.25 % bupivacaine for extradural analgesia in labour [J].
Eddleston, JM ;
Holland, JJ ;
Griffin, RP ;
Corbett, A ;
Horsman, EL ;
Reynolds, F .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1996, 76 (01) :66-71
[3]   ROPIVACAINE 0.25-PERCENT VERSUS BUPIVACAINE 0.25-PERCENT FOR CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL ANALGESIA IN LABOR - A DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON [J].
STIENSTRA, R ;
JONKER, TA ;
BOURDREZ, P ;
KUIJPERS, JC ;
VANKLEEF, JW ;
LUNDBERG, U .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1995, 80 (02) :285-289
[4]  
WRITER WD, 1996, REGIONAL ANESTHESIA, V21, P385
[5]  
Zaric D, 1996, REGION ANESTH, V21, P14