Day 3 embryo transfer with combined evaluation at the pronuclear and cleavage stages compares favourably with day 5 blastocyst transfer

被引:125
作者
Rienzi, L
Ubaldi, F
Iacobelli, M
Ferrero, S
Minasi, MG
Martinez, F
Tesarik, J
Greco, E
机构
[1] European Hosp, I-00149 Rome, Italy
[2] Mol Assisted Reprod & Genet, Granada 18002, Spain
关键词
blastocyst transfer; embryo quality evaluation; embryo transfer policy; pronuclear scoring;
D O I
10.1093/humrep/17.7.1852
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: The respective advantages of day 3 and day 5 embryo transfer are a matter of debate. Previous comparisons did not include pronuclear stage zygote scoring and cumulative success rates (fresh and cryopreserved embryos). METHODS: Patients were randomized prospectively for day 3 or day 5 embryo transfer. Day 3 embryos were selected for transfer and cryopreservation by using combined evaluation at the pronuclear and cleavage stages. RESULTS: There was no difference between day 3 and day 5 fresh embryo transfers as to the rates of pregnancy (58 versus 62%), clinical pregnancy (56 versus 58%), delivery (50 versus 48%), implantation (35 versus 38%) and birth (33 versus 36%) rates. The corresponding values for cryopreserved embryo transfers were also similar. However, day 3 embryo transfer compared favourably with day 5 transfer when the pregnancy (90 versus 66%), clinical pregnancy (85 versus 62%) and delivery (77 versus 52%) rates were calculated per oocyte recovery attempt. CONCLUSIONS: With a selected population of good prognosis patients and our embryo selection criteria, the implantation potential of day 3 and day 5 embryos is equal. Per oocyte recovery attempt, day 3 transfer is more clinically efficient than day 5 transfer, but at least one transfer of cryopreserved embryos is necessary to manifest this superiority.
引用
收藏
页码:1852 / 1855
页数:4
相关论文
共 27 条
[21]   The probability of abnormal preimplantation development can be predicted by a single static observation on pronuclear stage morphology [J].
Tesarik, J ;
Greco, E .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1999, 14 (05) :1318-1323
[22]   Embryos with high implantation potential after intracytoplasmic sperm injection can be recognized by a simple, non-invasive examination of pronuclear morphology [J].
Tesarik, J ;
Junca, AM ;
Hazout, A ;
Aubriot, FX ;
Nathan, C ;
Cohen-Bacrie, P ;
Dumont-Hassan, M .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2000, 15 (06) :1396-1399
[23]   Paternal effects acting during the first cell cycle of human preimplantation development after ICSI [J].
Tesarik, J ;
Mendoza, C ;
Greco, E .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2002, 17 (01) :184-189
[24]   Reproductive capacity of spermatozoa from men with testicular failure [J].
Ubaldi, F ;
Nagy, ZP ;
Rienzi, L ;
Tesarik, J ;
Anniballo, R ;
Franco, G ;
Menchini-Fabris, F ;
Greco, E .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1999, 14 (11) :2796-2800
[25]   Calculating the implantation potential of day 3 embryos in women younger than 38 years of age: a new model [J].
Van Royen, E ;
Mangelschots, K ;
De Neubourg, D ;
Laureys, I ;
Ryckaert, G ;
Gerris, J .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2001, 16 (02) :326-332
[26]   Characterization of a top quality embryo, a step towards single-embryo transfer [J].
Van Royen, E ;
Mangelschots, K ;
De Neubourg, D ;
Valkenburg, M ;
Van de Meerssche, M ;
Ryckaert, G ;
Eestermans, W ;
Gerris, J .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1999, 14 (09) :2345-2349
[27]  
Vidaeff AC, 2000, J REPROD MED, V45, P529