An eicosapentaenoic acid supplement versus megestrol acetate versus both for patients with cancer-associated wasting: A North Central Cancer Treatment Group and National Cancer Institute of Canada collaborative effort

被引:84
作者
Jatoi, A
Rowland, K
Loprinzi, CL
Sloan, JA
Dakhil, SR
MacDonald, N
Gagnon, B
Novotny, PJ
Mailliard, JA
Bushey, TIL
Nair, S
Christensen, B
机构
[1] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] McGill Univ, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Geisinger Med Clin, Danville, PA USA
[4] Geisinger Med Ctr, Community Clin Oncol Program, Danville, PA 17822 USA
[5] Missouri Valley Canc Consortium, Omaha, NE USA
[6] Canc Ctr Kansas, Wichita, KS USA
[7] Carle Canc Ctr, Community Clin Oncol Program, Urbana, IL USA
[8] Duluth Community Clin Oncol Program, Duluth, MN USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/jco.2004.06.024
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Studies suggest eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), an omega-3 fatty acid, augments weight, appetite, and survival in cancer-associated wasting. This study determined whether an EPA supplement-administered alone or with megestrol acetate (MA)-was more effective than VIA. Patients and Methods Four hundred twenty-one assessable patients with cancer-associated wasting were randomly assigned to an EPA supplement 1.09 g administered bid plus placebo; MA liquid suspension 600 mg/d plus an isocaloric, isonitrogenous supplement administered twice a day; or both. Eligible patients reported a 5-lb, 2-month weight loss and/or intake of less than 20 calories/kg/d. Results A smaller percentage taking the EPA supplement gained greater than or equal to 10% of baseline weight compared with those taking VIA: 6% v 18%, respectively (P = .004). Combination therapy resulted in weight gain of greater than or equal to 10% in 11% of patients (P = .17 across all arms). The percentage of patients with appetite improvement (North Central Cancer Treatment Group Questionnaire) was not statistically different: 63%, 69%, and 66%, in EPA-, MA-, and combination-treated arms, respectively (P = .69). In contrast, 4-week Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Therapy scores suggested MA-containing arms experienced superior appetite stimulation compared with the EPA arm, with scores of 40, 55, and 55 in EPA-, MA-, and combination-treated arms, respectively (P = .004). Survival was not significantly different. among arms. Global quality of life was not significantly different among groups. With the exception of increased impotence in MA-treated patients, toxicity was comparable. Conclusion This EPA supplement, either alone or in combination with MA, does not improve weight or appetite better than MA alone. (C) 2004 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:2469 / 2476
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [11] 3.0.CO
  • [12] 2-1
  • [13] PENTOXIFYLLINE FOR TREATMENT OF CANCER ANOREXIA AND CACHEXIA - A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL
    GOLDBERG, RM
    LOPRINZI, CL
    MAILLIARD, JA
    OFALLON, JR
    KROOK, JE
    GHOSH, C
    HESTORFF, RD
    CHONG, SF
    REUTER, NF
    SHANAHAN, TG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 13 (11) : 2856 - 2859
  • [14] Fish and omega-3 fatty acid intake and risk of coronary heart disease in women
    Hu, FB
    Bronner, L
    Willett, WC
    Stampfer, MJ
    Rexrode, KM
    Albert, CM
    Hunter, D
    Manson, JE
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 287 (14): : 1815 - 1821
  • [15] Dronabinol versus megestrol acetate versus combination therapy for cancer-associated anorexia: A North Central Cancer Treatment Group Study
    Jatoi, A
    Windschitl, HE
    Loprinzi, CL
    Sloan, JA
    Dakhil, SR
    Mailliard, JA
    Pundaleeka, S
    Kardinal, CG
    Fitch, TR
    Krook, JE
    Novotny, PJ
    Christensen, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (02) : 567 - 573
  • [16] Statistical considerations in the intent-to-treat principle
    Lachin, JM
    [J]. CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 2000, 21 (03): : 167 - 189
  • [17] Randomized comparison of megestrol acetate versus dexamethasone versus fluoxymesterone for the treatment of cancer anorexia/cachexia
    Loprinzi, CL
    Kugler, JW
    Sloan, JA
    Mailliard, JA
    Krook, JE
    Wilwerding, MB
    Rowland, KM
    Camoriano, JK
    Novotny, PJ
    Christensen, BJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (10) : 3299 - 3306
  • [18] CONTROLLED TRIAL OF MEGESTROL-ACETATE FOR THE TREATMENT OF CANCER ANOREXIA AND CACHEXIA
    LOPRINZI, CL
    ELLISON, NM
    SCHAID, DJ
    KROOK, JE
    ATHMANN, LM
    DOSE, AM
    MAILLIARD, JA
    JOHNSON, PS
    EBBERT, LP
    GEERAERTS, LH
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1990, 82 (13): : 1127 - 1132
  • [19] POCOCK SJ, 1983, CLIN TRIALS PRACTICA, P200
  • [20] Perspective: Fish - Food to calm the heart.
    Rosenberg, IH
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (15) : 1102 - 1103