Further exploring the potential of residential demand response programs in electricity distribution

被引:94
作者
Bartusch, Cajsa [1 ]
Alvehag, Karin [2 ]
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ, Div Ind Engn & Management, Dept Engn Sci, SE-75121 Uppsala, Sweden
[2] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Sch Elect Engn, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Smart grids; Time-of-use tariffs; Demand-based tariffs; Demand response; Demand response programs; Residential electricity consumption; TARIFF; GRIDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.03.054
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Smart grids play a key role in realizing climate ambitions. Boosting consumption flexibility is an essential measure in bringing the potential gains of smart grids to fruition. The collective scientific understanding of demand response programs argues that time-of-use tariffs have proven its merits. The findings upon which this conclusion rests are, however, primarily derived from studies covering energy-based time-of-use rates over fairly short periods of time. Hence, this empirical study set out with the intention of estimating the extent of response to a demand-based time-of-use electricity distribution tariff among Swedish single-family homes in the long term. The results show that six years after the implementation households still respond to the price signals of the tariff by cutting demand in peak hours and shifting electricity consumption from peak to off-peak hours. Studies conducted in the Nordic countries commonly include only homeowners and so another aim of the study was to explore the potential of demand response programs among households living in apartment buildings. The demand-based tariff proved to bring about similar, but not as marked, effects in rental apartments, whereas there are virtually no corresponding evidences of demand response in condominium apartments. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 59
页数:21
相关论文
共 32 条
[21]  
Lyden P, 2011, LOKALNATSTARIFFER ST
[22]   The effect of utility time-varying pricing and load control strategies on residential summer peak electricity use: A review [J].
Newsham, Guy R. ;
Bowker, Brent G. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (07) :3289-3296
[23]  
Pyrko J, 2006, P 4 INT C EEDAL 06 L, P199
[24]  
PYRKO J, 2003, ECEEE SUMM STUD 2003, P987
[25]   Demand Response From Household Customers: Experiences From a Pilot Study in Norway [J].
Saele, Hanne ;
Grande, Ove S. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, 2011, 2 (01) :102-109
[26]   An analysis of a demand charge electricity grid tariff in the residential sector [J].
Stokke, Andreas V. ;
Doorman, Gerard L. ;
Ericson, Torgeir .
ENERGY EFFICIENCY, 2010, 3 (03) :267-282
[27]  
Stromback J., 2011, The potential of smart meter enabled programs to increase energy and systems efficiency: a mass pilot comparison, Vaasaett
[28]  
Tan Y.T., 2007, CLASSIFICATION CONTR
[29]   Demand response experience in Europe: Policies, programmes and implementation [J].
Torriti, Jacopo ;
Hassan, Mohamed G. ;
Leach, Matthew .
ENERGY, 2010, 35 (04) :1575-1583
[30]   Residential winter kW h responsiveness under optional time-varying pricing in British Columbia [J].
Woo, C. K. ;
Li, R. ;
Shiu, A. ;
Horowitz, I. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2013, 108 :288-297