Policy strategies to address sustainability of Alaskan boreal forests in response to a directionally changing climate

被引:99
作者
Chapin, F. Stuart, III [1 ]
Lovecraft, Amy L.
Zavaleta, Erika S.
Nelson, Joanna
Robards, Martin D.
Kofinas, Gary P.
Trainor, Sarah F.
Peterson, Garry D.
Huntington, Henry P.
Naylor, Rosamond L.
机构
[1] Univ Alaska, Inst Arctic Biol, Fairbanks, AK 99775 USA
[2] Univ Alaska, Dept Polit Sci, Fairbanks, AK 99775 USA
[3] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Dept Environm Studies, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
[4] McGill Univ, Dept Geog, Montreal, PQ H3A 2K6, Canada
[5] Huntington Consulting, Eagle River, AK 99577 USA
[6] Stanford Univ, Woods Inst Environm, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
adaptability; Alaska; climate change; resilience; vulnerability;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.0606955103
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Human activities are altering many factors that determine the fundamental properties of ecological and social systems. Is sustainability a realistic goal in a world in which many key process controls are directionally changing? To address this issue, we integrate several disparate sources of theory to address sustainability in directionally changing social-ecological systems, apply this framework to climate-warming impacts in Interior Alaska, and describe a suite of policy strategies that emerge from these analyses. Climate warming in Interior Alaska has profoundly affected factors that influence landscape processes (climate regulation and disturbance spread) and natural hazards, but has only indirectly influenced ecosystem goods such as food, water, and wood that receive most management attention. Warming has reduced cultural services provided by ecosystems, leading to some of the few institutional responses that directly address the causes of climate warming, e.g., indigenous initiatives to the Arctic Council. Four broad policy strategies emerge: (i) enhancing human adaptability through learning and innovation in the context of changes occurring at multiple scales; (ii) increasing resilience by strengthening negative (stabilizing) feedbacks that buffer the system from change and increasing options for adaptation through biological, cultural, and economic diversity; (iii) reducing vulnerability by strengthening institutions that link the high-latitude impacts of climate warming to their low-latitude causes; and (iv) facilitating transformation to new, potentially more beneficial states by taking advantage of opportunities created by crisis. Each strategy provides societal benefits, and we suggest that all of them be pursued simultaneously.
引用
收藏
页码:16637 / 16643
页数:7
相关论文
共 65 条
[31]  
Diamond Jared., 2005, COLLAPSE
[32]   The struggle to govern the commons [J].
Dietz, T ;
Ostrom, E ;
Stern, PC .
SCIENCE, 2003, 302 (5652) :1907-1912
[33]   Response diversity, ecosystem change, and resilience [J].
Elmqvist, T ;
Folke, C ;
Nyström, M ;
Peterson, G ;
Bengtsson, J ;
Walker, B ;
Norberg, J .
FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 1 (09) :488-494
[34]   Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems [J].
Folke, C ;
Hahn, T ;
Olsson, P ;
Norberg, J .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, 2005, 30 :441-473
[35]   Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses [J].
Folke, Carl .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2006, 16 (03) :253-267
[36]  
Forbes BC, 2004, AMBIO, V33, P377, DOI 10.1639/0044-7447(2004)033[0377:GVIADT]2.0.CO
[37]  
2
[38]   A framework for assessing the vulnerability of communities in the Canadian arctic to risks associated with climate change [J].
Ford, JD ;
Smit, B .
ARCTIC, 2004, 57 (04) :389-400
[39]  
FRESCO NL, 2006, THESIS U ALASKA FAIR
[40]  
Gunderson L. H., 2002, Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems