State Ownership and Firm Innovation in China: An Integrated View of Institutional and Efficiency Logics

被引:866
作者
Zhou, Kevin Zheng [1 ]
Gao, Gerald Yong [2 ]
Zhao, Hongxin [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Fac Business & Econ, Sch Business, Strategy & Int business, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Missouri, Coll Business Adm, Mkt, One Univ Blvd, St Louis, MO 63021 USA
[3] St Louis Univ, John Cook Sch Business, Boeing Inst Int Business, Int Business, 3674 Lindell Blvd, St Louis, MO 63108 USA
关键词
state ownership; innovation; agency theory; institutional theory; industrial competition; state start-up; emerging economies; Chinese manufacturing; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; EMERGING MARKETS; ECONOMIC TRANSITION; MANAGERIAL TIES; BUSINESS GROUPS; PERFORMANCE; STRATEGY; CAPABILITIES; INTENSITY; ALLIANCES;
D O I
10.1177/0001839216674457
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Using two longitudinal panel datasets of Chinese manufacturing firms, we assess whether state ownership benefits or impedes firms' innovation. We show that state ownership in an emerging economy enables a firm to obtain crucial R&D resources but makes the firm less efficient in using those resources to generate innovation, and we find that a minority state ownership is an optimal structure for innovation development in this context. Moreover, the inefficiency of state ownership in transforming R&D input into innovation output decreases when industrial competition is high, as well as for start-up firms. Our findings integrate the efficiency logic (agency theory), which views state ownership as detrimental to innovation, and institutional logic, which notes that governments in emerging economies have critical influences on regulatory policies and control over scarce resources. We discuss the implications of these findings for research on state ownership and firm innovation in emerging economies.
引用
收藏
页码:375 / 404
页数:30
相关论文
共 88 条
[41]  
Khanna T, 1997, HARVARD BUS REV, V75, P41
[42]   The future of business groups in emerging markets: Long-run evidence from Chile [J].
Khanna, T ;
Palepu, K .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2000, 43 (03) :268-285
[43]   Learning From Economic Experiments in China and India [J].
Khanna, Tarun .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2009, 23 (02) :36-43
[44]   Do lenders favor politically connected firms? Rent provision in an emerging financial market [J].
Khwaja, AI ;
Mian, A .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2005, 120 (04) :1371-1411
[45]   Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms [J].
Laursen, K ;
Salter, A .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2006, 27 (02) :131-150
[46]   STRATEGIZING BY THE GOVERNMENT: CAN INDUSTRIAL POLICY CREATE FIRM-LEVEL COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE? [J].
Lazzarini, Sergio G. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2015, 36 (01) :97-112
[47]   Introduction to the special issue on "Innovation in and from Emerging Economies" Introduction [J].
Lee, Ruby P. ;
Ozsomer, Aysegul ;
Zhou, Kevin Z. .
INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2015, 50 :16-17
[48]   Why do entrepreneurs enter politics? Evidence from China [J].
Li, Hongbin ;
Meng, Lingsheng ;
Zhang, Junsen .
ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 2006, 44 (03) :559-578
[49]   Do managerial ties in China always produce value? Competition, uncertainty, and domestic vs. foreign firms [J].
Li, Julie Juan ;
Poppo, Laura ;
Zhou, Kevin Zheng .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2008, 29 (04) :383-400
[50]   The roles and performance of state firms and non-state firms in China's economic transition [J].
Li, Shaomin ;
Xia, Jun .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2008, 36 (01) :39-54