Understanding the Determinants of Political Ideology: Implications of Structural Complexity

被引:450
作者
Feldman, Stanley [1 ]
Johnston, Christopher [2 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Durham, NC 27706 USA
关键词
ideology; political attitudes; personality; motivation; PUBLIC SUPPORT; PERSONALITY; ATTITUDES; CONSERVATISM; ORIENTATION; CONFLICT; BELIEFS; VALUES; MODEL; NEEDS;
D O I
10.1111/pops.12055
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
There has been a substantial increase in research on the determinants and consequences of political ideology among political scientists and social psychologists. In psychology, researchers have examined the effects of personality and motivational factors on ideological orientations as well as differences in moral reasoning and brain functioning between liberals and conservatives. In political science, studies have investigated possible genetic influences on ideology as well as the role of personality factors. Virtually all of this research begins with the assumption that it is possible to understand the determinants and consequences of ideology via a unidimensional conceptualization. We argue that a unidimensional model of ideology provides an incomplete basis for the study of political ideology. We show that two dimensionseconomic and social ideologyare the minimum needed to account for domestic policy preferences. More importantly, we demonstrate that the determinants of these two ideological dimensions are vastly different across a wide range of variables. Focusing on a single ideological dimension obscures these differences and, in some cases, makes it difficult to observe important determinants of ideology. We also show that this multidimensionality leads to a significant amount of heterogeneity in the structure of ideology that must be modeled to fully understand the structure and determinants of political attitudes.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 358
页数:22
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   MASS POLITICAL-ATTITUDES AND SURVEY RESPONSE [J].
ACHEN, CH .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1975, 69 (04) :1218-1231
[2]   Are political orientations genetically transmitted? [J].
Alford, JR ;
Funk, CL ;
Hibbing, JR .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2005, 99 (02) :153-167
[3]   The other "authoritarian personality" [J].
Altemeyer, B .
ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 30, 1998, 30 :47-92
[4]   Neurocognitive correlates of liberalism and conservatism [J].
Amodio, David M. ;
Jost, John T. ;
Master, Sarah L. ;
Yee, Cindy M. .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2007, 10 (10) :1246-1247
[5]  
[Anonymous], VOTER COMPETENCE
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2001, The Great Divide: Religious and Cultural Conflict in American Party Politic
[7]   The strength of issues: Using multiple measures to gauge preference stability, ideological constraint, and issue voting [J].
Ansolabehere, Stephen ;
Rodden, Jonathan ;
Snyder, James M., Jr. .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2008, 102 (02) :215-232
[8]   A New Partisan Voter [J].
Bafumi, Joseph ;
Shapiro, Robert Y. .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2009, 71 (01) :1-24
[9]   Assuming the costs of war: Events, elites, and american public support for military conflict [J].
Berinsky, Adam J. .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2007, 69 (04) :975-997
[10]   Between nationalism and civilizationism: the European populist moment in comparative perspective [J].
Brubaker, Rogers .
ETHNIC AND RACIAL STUDIES, 2017, 40 (08) :1191-1226