Understanding the Determinants of Political Ideology: Implications of Structural Complexity

被引:450
作者
Feldman, Stanley [1 ]
Johnston, Christopher [2 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Durham, NC 27706 USA
关键词
ideology; political attitudes; personality; motivation; PUBLIC SUPPORT; PERSONALITY; ATTITUDES; CONSERVATISM; ORIENTATION; CONFLICT; BELIEFS; VALUES; MODEL; NEEDS;
D O I
10.1111/pops.12055
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
There has been a substantial increase in research on the determinants and consequences of political ideology among political scientists and social psychologists. In psychology, researchers have examined the effects of personality and motivational factors on ideological orientations as well as differences in moral reasoning and brain functioning between liberals and conservatives. In political science, studies have investigated possible genetic influences on ideology as well as the role of personality factors. Virtually all of this research begins with the assumption that it is possible to understand the determinants and consequences of ideology via a unidimensional conceptualization. We argue that a unidimensional model of ideology provides an incomplete basis for the study of political ideology. We show that two dimensionseconomic and social ideologyare the minimum needed to account for domestic policy preferences. More importantly, we demonstrate that the determinants of these two ideological dimensions are vastly different across a wide range of variables. Focusing on a single ideological dimension obscures these differences and, in some cases, makes it difficult to observe important determinants of ideology. We also show that this multidimensionality leads to a significant amount of heterogeneity in the structure of ideology that must be modeled to fully understand the structure and determinants of political attitudes.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 358
页数:22
相关论文
共 55 条
[11]  
Campbell Angus., 1960, AM VOTER
[12]   The Secret Lives of Liberals and Conservatives: Personality Profiles, Interaction Styles, and the Things They Leave Behind [J].
Carney, Dana R. ;
Jost, John T. ;
Gosling, Samuel D. ;
Potter, Jeff .
POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 29 (06) :807-840
[13]  
Clark S.L., 2009, Relating latent class analysis results to variables not included in the analysis
[14]   THE ORIGINS AND MEANING OF LIBERAL-CONSERVATIVE SELF-IDENTIFICATIONS [J].
CONOVER, PJ ;
FELDMAN, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 1981, 25 (04) :617-645
[15]  
CONVERSE PE, 1964, IDEOLOGY DISCONTENT
[16]   The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model [J].
Duckitt, J ;
Wagner, C ;
du Plessis, I ;
Birum, I .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 83 (01) :75-93
[17]   A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice [J].
Duckitt, J .
ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 33, 2001, 33 :41-113
[18]  
Ellis C., 2012, IDEOLOGY AM
[19]   The humanitarian foundation of public support for social welfare [J].
Feldman, S ;
Steenbergen, MR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2001, 45 (03) :658-677