Effects of urethrography on prostate position: Considerations for radiotherapy treatment planning of prostate carcinoma

被引:20
作者
Malone, S [1 ]
Donker, R [1 ]
Broader, M [1 ]
Dahrouge, S [1 ]
Szanto, J [1 ]
Gerig, L [1 ]
Bociek, G [1 ]
Crook, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Ottawa Reg Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2000年 / 46卷 / 01期
关键词
urethrogram; prostate apex; conformal radiotherapy; prostate fiducials; fiducial markers;
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(99)00425-3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Purpose: Retrograde urethrography is commonly used to define the prostate apex at simulation, This study evaluated the hypothesis that urethrography causes prostate displacement, resulting in an error in treatment planning, Methods and Materials: Forty-five patients with carcinoma of the prostate were evaluated. Gold seeds were placed in the apex, posterior wall, and base of the gland. In the first 20 patients, the position of the seed-defined apex was compared at simulation (with urethrogram) and on day 1 of treatment (without urethrogram). In the second cohort of 25 patients, the effects of urethrography on prostate position were evaluated directly at simulation by comparing the position of apex pre- and post-urethrography, An analysis was performed to estimate the possible impact of urethrogram-induced prostate motion on target coverage. Results: The mean superior displacement in the first and second cohort was 5.2 mm and 6.8 mm, respectively (combined mean shift 6.1 mm), With a IO-mm field margin below the tip of the urethrogram cone, 56% of patients in this study would have inadequate planning target volume (PTV) coverage. Conclusion: Retrograde urethrography causes a significant superior shift of the prostate. Strict reliance on urethrography in determining the inferior field margin could result in inadequate treatment. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 93
页数:5
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]
LOCALIZATION OF THE PROSTATIC APEX FOR RADIATION TREATMENT PLANNING [J].
ALGAN, O ;
HANKS, GE ;
SHAER, AH .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1995, 33 (04) :925-930
[2]
Prostate target volume variations during a course of radiotherapy [J].
Antolak, JA ;
Rosen, II ;
Childress, CH ;
Zagars, GK ;
Pollack, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 42 (03) :661-672
[3]
ASBELL SO, 1980, INT J RADIAT ONCOL, V6, P861, DOI 10.1016/0360-3016(80)90324-7
[4]
MEASUREMENT OF PROSTATE MOVEMENT OVER THE COURSE OF ROUTINE RADIOTHERAPY USING IMPLANTED MARKERS [J].
BALTER, JM ;
SANDLER, HM ;
LAM, K ;
BREE, RL ;
LICHTER, AS ;
TENHAKEN, RK .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1995, 31 (01) :113-118
[5]
BAUMAN N, 1998, UROL TIMES, V6, P4
[6]
BAUMAN N, 1998, UROL TIMES, V6, P1
[7]
Analysis of prostate and seminal vesicle motion: Implications for treatment planning [J].
Beard, CJ ;
Kijewski, P ;
Bussiere, M ;
Gelman, R ;
Gladstone, D ;
Shaffer, K ;
Plunkett, M ;
Costello, P ;
Coleman, CN .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1996, 34 (02) :451-458
[8]
BYAR DP, 1972, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V30, P5, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(197207)30:1<5::AID-CNCR2820300103>3.0.CO
[9]
2-S
[10]
PROSTATE-CANCER - COMPARISON OF RETROGRADE URETHROGRAPHY AND COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY IN RADIOTHERAPY PLANNING [J].
COX, JA ;
ZAGORIA, RJ ;
RABEN, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1994, 29 (05) :1119-1123