In vivo kinematics of mobile-bearing knee arthroplasty in deep knee bending motion

被引:33
作者
Watanabe, T
Yamazaki, T
Sugamoto, K
Tomita, T
Hashimoto, H
Maeda, D
Tamura, S
Ochi, T
Yoshikawa, H
机构
[1] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Med, Div Comp Integrated Orthopaed Surg, Suita, Osaka 5650871, Japan
[2] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Med, Div Interdisciplinary Image Anal, Suita, Osaka 5650871, Japan
[3] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed, Suita, Osaka 5650871, Japan
[4] Osaka Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Suita, Osaka 5650871, Japan
关键词
total knee arthroplasty; mobile-bearing; kinematics; fluoroscopy; two- to three-dimensional registration;
D O I
10.1016/j.orthres.2003.12.013
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The current study aimed to analyze kinematics during deep knee bending motion by subjects with fully congruent mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties allowing axial rotation and anteroposterior (AP) gliding. Twelve subjects were implanted with Dual Bearing Knee prostheses (DBK, slot type: Finsbury Orthopaedics, Surrey, UK). These implants include a mobile-bearing insert that is fully congruent with the femoral component throughout flexion and allows axial rotation and limited AP translation. Sequential fluoroscopic images were taken in the sagittal plane during loaded knee bending motion. In vivo kinematics were analyzed using a two- to three-dimensional registration technique, which uses computer-assisted design models to reproduce the spatial position of femoral and tibial components from single-view fluoroscopic images. The average femoral component demonstrated 13.4degrees external axial rotation for 0-120degrees flexion. On average, the medial condyle moved anteriorly 6.2 mm for 0-100degrees flexion, then posteriorly 4.0 mm for 100-120degrees flexion. On average, the lateral condyle moved anteriorly 1.0 mm for 0-40degrees flexion, then posteriorly 8.7 mm for 40-120degrees flexion. The typical subject exhibited a lateral pivot pattern from extension to 60degrees flexion and a central pivot pattern from 60degrees to 100degrees flexion, patterns that are not usually observed in normal knees. Subsequently from 100degrees to 120degrees flexion, a rollback pattern was reproduced in which bilateral condyles moved backward. (C) 2004 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1044 / 1049
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   In vivo three-dimensional knee kinematics using a biplanar image-matching technique [J].
Asano, T ;
Akagi, M ;
Tanaka, K ;
Tamura, J ;
Nakamura, T .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2001, (388) :157-166
[2]   Accurate measurement of three-dimensional knee replacement kinematics using single-plane fluoroscopy [J].
Banks, SA ;
Hodge, WA .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1996, 43 (06) :638-649
[3]   In vivo determination of posterior femoral rollback for subjects having a NexGen posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty [J].
Bertin, KC ;
Komistek, RD ;
Dennis, DA ;
Hoff, WA ;
Anderson, DT ;
Langer, T .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2002, 17 (08) :1040-1048
[4]   THE NEW-JERSEY LOW-CONTACT-STRESS KNEE REPLACEMENT SYSTEM - BIOMECHANICAL RATIONALE AND REVIEW OF THE 1ST 123 CEMENTED CASES [J].
BUECHEL, FF ;
PAPPAS, MJ .
ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 1986, 105 (04) :197-204
[5]  
DENNIS DA, 2003, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V410, P114
[6]  
DENNIS DA, 1996, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V331, P107
[7]  
DENNIS DA, 1998, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V356, P47
[8]   MECHANICS OF KNEE AND PROSTHESIS DESIGN [J].
GOODFELLOW, J ;
OCONNOR, J .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1978, 60 (03) :358-369
[9]   A JOINT COORDINATE SYSTEM FOR THE CLINICAL DESCRIPTION OF 3-DIMENSIONAL MOTIONS - APPLICATION TO THE KNEE [J].
GROOD, ES ;
SUNTAY, WJ .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1983, 105 (02) :136-144
[10]   Kinematic comparison of posterior cruciate sacrifice versus substitution in a mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty [J].
Haas, BD ;
Komistek, RD ;
Stiehl, JB ;
Anderson, DT ;
Northcut, EJ .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2002, 17 (06) :685-692