Individual aggressiveness measured in a resident-intruder test predicts the persistence of aggressive behaviour and weight gain of young pigs after mixing

被引:86
作者
D'Eath, RB [1 ]
机构
[1] Scottish Agr Coll, Anim Biol Div, Dept Behav Sci, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
pig; swine; aggression; aggressiveness; social behaviour; resident-intruder test;
D O I
10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00077-1
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Young growing pigs of both sexes housed in littermate groups of eight were given an aggressiveness score based on two resident-intruder tests. They were then mixed into new groups of eight, composed of four randomly selected pigs from each of two litters, and behaviour was observed for 2 days (days 1 and 2). Aggressive social behaviour at mixing was analysed using weight and aggressiveness score (at both the group and individual levels) as explanatory variates. On day 1: heavier pigs in each group were more involved in fighting, won more fights, and also initiated more brief aggressive acts (headknocks and bites). Bullying was more frequent in groups with higher aggressiveness scores, and aggressive pigs also initiated more headknocks. On day 2: pigs with high aggressiveness scores persisted in showing aggressive behaviour, initiating fights, headknocks and chases. Aggressiveness score was now also associated with fighting success (in addition to weight). On both days, pigs preferred to lie with littermates rather than unfamiliar pigs, although this preference was less marked on day 2. A stronger preference for littermates was shown in heavier groups. A greater number of skin lesions were recorded at the beginning of day 2 in groups containing heavier pigs and/or pigs with higher aggressiveness scores. Weight gain in the 5 days following mixing was lower in groups containing pigs with high aggressiveness scores. Overall, weight and aggressiveness score (measured in a resident-intruder test) each affected different aspects of aggressive behaviour at mixing. While weight predicted success in agonistic interactions, aggressiveness affected the nature and time scale of interaction: high aggressiveness score pigs showed more one-sided aggression (bullying) and their aggressive behaviour was more persistent, continuing into the day after mixing. Thus, aggression at mixing can be reduced by mixing smaller pigs, and identifying a means of reducing individual aggressiveness would be worthwhile. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved,
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 283
页数:17
相关论文
共 68 条
[21]   BEHAVIOR AND PERFORMANCE OF PIGS GROUPED BY 3 DIFFERENT METHODS AT WEANING [J].
FRIEND, TH ;
KNABE, DA ;
TANKSLEY, TD .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1983, 57 (06) :1406-1411
[22]   Observations on behaviour and skin damage of slaughter pigs and treatment during lairage [J].
Geverink, NA ;
Engel, B ;
Lambooij, E ;
Wiegant, VM .
APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 1996, 50 (01) :1-13
[23]   BOAR PRESENCE REDUCES FIGHTING IN MIXED SLAUGHTER-WEIGHT PIGS [J].
GRANDIN, T ;
BRUNING, J .
APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 1992, 33 (2-3) :273-276
[24]   SOCIAL-BEHAVIOR AND GROWTH OF PIGS FOLLOWING MIXING DURING GROWING - FINISHING PERIOD [J].
GRAVES, HB ;
GRAVES, KL ;
SHERRITT, GW .
APPLIED ANIMAL ETHOLOGY, 1978, 4 (02) :169-180
[25]   BEHAVIOR AND ECOLOGY OF WILD AND FERAL SWINE (SUS-SCROFA) [J].
GRAVES, HB .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1984, 58 (02) :482-492
[26]   FACTORS INFLUENCING THE WELFARE AND CARCASS AND MEAT QUALITY OF PIGS .2. MIXING UNFAMILIAR PIGS [J].
GUISE, HJ ;
PENNY, RHC .
ANIMAL PRODUCTION, 1989, 49 :517-521
[27]   The role of corticotropin-releasing factor and urocortin in the modulation of ingestive behavior [J].
Heinrichs, SC ;
Richard, D .
NEUROPEPTIDES, 1999, 33 (05) :350-359
[28]   ARE THERE PREEXISTING BEHAVIORAL-CHARACTERISTICS THAT PREDICT THE DOMINANT STATUS OF MALE NIH SWISS MICE (MUS-MUSCULUS) [J].
HILAKIVICLARKE, LA ;
LISTER, RG .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 106 (02) :184-189
[29]  
HOOD KE, 1989, AGGRESSIVE BEHAV, V15, P361, DOI 10.1002/1098-2337(1989)15:5<361::AID-AB2480150505>3.0.CO
[30]  
2-6