Improving the acceptability of the atrial defibrillator: Patient-activated cardioversion versus automatic night cardioversion with and without sedation (ADSAS 2)

被引:12
作者
Boodhoo, L
Mitchell, A
Ujhelyi, M
Sulke, N
机构
[1] Eastbourne Gen Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Eastbourne BN21 2UD, England
[2] Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, MN USA
来源
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY | 2004年 / 27卷 / 07期
关键词
atrial fibrillation; atrial defibrillator; cardioversion; sedation;
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-8159.2004.00558.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Acceptability of the atrial defibrillator is partly limited by concerns about shock related anxiety and discomfort. Sedation and/or automatic cardioversion therapy during sleep may ease shock discomfort and improve patient acceptability. Three atrial cardioversion techniques were compared: patient-activated cardioversion with sedation, automatic night cardioversion with sedation, and automatic night cardioversion without sedation. Sedation was oral midazolam (15 mg). Fifteen patients aged 60 +/- 13 years were assigned each strategy randomly for three consecutive episodes of persistent atrial fibrillation requiring cardioversion. Patients completed questionnaires for multiple parameters immediately and again at 24 hours postcardioversion. Atrial cardioversion strategies with oral sedation (patient-activated and automatic) significantly reduced shock recall by 77% (P < 0.005), therapy dissatisfaction by 57%-71% (P < 0.03), shock discomfort by 61%-73% (P < 0.01), shock pain by 79%-83% (P < 0.001), and shock intensity by 73 %-77% (P < 0.03), compared to automatic night cardioversion without sedation (P < 0.02). Atrial shock pain was short-lived and caused little disruption to the patients' daily routines. Automatic night cardioversion without sedation, resulted in sleep disturbances not seen with the other strategies (42% vs 0%, P < 0.001) as well as concerns about future pain or discomfort. Twelve patients (80%) chose patient-activated cardioversion with sedation as their preferred treatment, and three (20%) remainder chose automatic night cardioversion with sedation. Ninety percent of patients chose automatic night cardioversion without sedation as the least acceptable therapy. Sedation significantly increases atrial shock acceptability regardless of cardioversion method. Shocks without sedation are significantly less acceptable to patients using the atrial defibrillators.
引用
收藏
页码:910 / 917
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Effect of electrode position on outcome of low-energy intracardiac cardioversion of atrial fibrillation [J].
Alt, E ;
Schmitt, C ;
Ammer, R ;
Plewan, A ;
Evans, F ;
Pasquantonio, J ;
Ideker, T ;
Lehmann, G ;
Putter, K ;
Schomig, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1997, 79 (05) :621-625
[2]   Pain threshold for low energy intracardiac cardioversion of atrial fibrillation with low or no sedation [J].
Ammer, R ;
Alt, E ;
Ayers, G ;
Schmitt, C ;
Pasquantonio, J ;
Schmidt, M ;
Putter, K ;
Schomig, A .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 20 (01) :230-236
[3]   Efficacy and tolerability in fully conscious patients of transvenous low-energy internal atrial cardioversion for atrial fibrillation [J].
Boriani, G ;
Biffi, M ;
Bronzetti, G ;
Ayers, GM ;
Zannoli, R ;
Branzi, A ;
Capucci, A ;
Magnani, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 81 (02) :241-244
[4]  
Cooper RAS, 1997, CIRCULATION, V95, P1487
[5]   Marked reduction in internal atrial defibrillation thresholds with dual-current pathways and sequential shocks in humans [J].
Cooper, RAS ;
Plumb, VJ ;
Epstein, AE ;
Kay, GN ;
Ideker, RE .
CIRCULATION, 1998, 97 (25) :2527-2535
[6]   Patient experiences with atrial fibrillation and treatment with implantable atrial defibrillation therapy [J].
Deaton, C ;
Dunbar, SB ;
Moloney, M ;
Sears, SF ;
Ujhelyi, MR .
HEART & LUNG, 2003, 32 (05) :291-299
[7]   Clinical experience with a dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator to treat atrial tachyarrhythmias [J].
Gold, MR ;
Sulke, N ;
Schwartzman, DS ;
Mehra, R ;
Euler, DE .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 12 (11) :1247-1253
[8]   Efficacy and tolerability of automatic nighttime atrial fibrillation shocks in patients with permanent internal atrial defibrillators [J].
Haffajee, CI ;
Chaudhry, GM ;
Casavant, D ;
Pacetti, PE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2002, 89 (07) :875-+
[9]   A comparison of transvenous atrial defibrillation of acute and chronic atrial fibrillation and the effect of intravenous sotalol on human atrial defibrillation threshold [J].
Lau, CP ;
Lok, NS .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 20 (10) :2442-2452
[10]  
Levy S, 1997, CIRCULATION, V96, P253