The relationship between preferred and optimal positioning during submaximal cycle ergometry

This study was designed to determine how changes in oxygen uptake (VO2) and heart rate (HR) during submaximal cycle ergometry were determined by changes in cycle geometry and/or lower-limb kinematics. Fourteen trained cyclists [Mean (SD): age, 25.5 (6.4) years. body mass 74.4 (8.8) kg; peak VO2, 4.76 (0.79) 1. min(-1) peak] were tested at three seat-tube angles (70 degrees, 80 degrees, 90 degrees) at each of three trunk angles (10 degrees, 20 degrees, 30 degrees) using a modified Monark cycle ergometer. All conditions were tested at a power output corresponding to 95% of the VO2 at each subject's ventilatory threshold while pedalling at 90 rpm and using aerodynamic handlebars. Sagittal-view kinematics for the hip, knee, and ankle joints were also recorded for all conditions and for the subjects' preferred positioning on their own bicycles. No combination of seat-tube and trunk angle could be considered optimal since many of the nine conditions elicited statistically similar mean VO2 and HR values. Mean hip angle (HA) was the only kinematic variable that changed consistently across conditions. A regression relationship was not observed between mean VO2 or HR and mean hip angle values (P > 0.45). Significant curvilinear relationships were observed, however, between Delta VO2 (VO2 - minimum VO2) and Delta HA (mean HA - preferred HA) using the data from all subjects (R = 0.45, SEE = 0.13 l.min(-1)) and using group mean values (R = 0.93, SEE = 0.03 l.min(-1)). In both cases Delta VO2, minimized at Delta HA = 0, which corresponded to the subjects' preferred HA from their own bicycles. Thus, subjects optimized their VO2 cost at cycle geometries that elicited similar lower-limb kinematics as the preferred geometries from their own bicycles.