The availability, strength and efficiency of appropriability mechanisms - protecting investments in knowledge creation

被引:35
作者
Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, Pia [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Lappeenranta Univ Technol, Sch Business, FI-53851 Lappeenranta, Finland
[2] Univ Oulu, Dept Econ & Business Adm, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland
关键词
appropriability mechanisms; appropriability regime; appropriability strategy; efficiency; imitation; knowledge protection; R-AND-D; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY; PATENTS; INNOVATION; INDUSTRY; COLLABORATION; INCENTIVES; MARKETS; RIGHTS;
D O I
10.1504/IJTM.2009.022653
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Innovations that show signs of becoming successful are very likely to be widely imitated. Therefore, making intellectual assets proprietary and taking control over them may be critical in terms of getting adequate returns on investments. There are several mechanisms a firm can use to build a protective fence around its innovations. These mechanisms are very different in terms of their availability and strength in protecting intangibles, for example and their efficiency on the strategic level, meaning their suitability for the aims of the company also varies a lot. These three dimensions of appropriability are, therefore, worth closer examination.
引用
收藏
页码:282 / 290
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], NIST SPECIAL PUBLICA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Paper w7552
[3]   Patents, licensing, and market structure in the chemical industry [J].
Arora, A .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1997, 26 (4-5) :391-403
[4]   The relative effectiveness of patents and secrecy for appropriation [J].
Arundel, A .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2001, 30 (04) :611-624
[5]   The role of appropriability in sustaining competitive advantage - an electronic auction system case study [J].
Atkins, MH .
JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 1998, 7 (02) :131-152
[6]   Protecting intellectual capital in international alliances [J].
Baughn, CC ;
Denekamp, JG ;
Stevens, JH ;
Osborn, RN .
JOURNAL OF WORLD BUSINESS, 1997, 32 (02) :103-117
[7]   Intellectual property rights and standardization: the case of GSM [J].
Bekkers, R ;
Verspagen, B ;
Smits, J .
TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY, 2002, 26 (3-4) :171-188
[8]   Playing the collaboration game right -: balancing trust and contracting [J].
Blomqvist, K ;
Hurmelinna, P ;
Seppänen, R .
TECHNOVATION, 2005, 25 (05) :497-504
[9]   The case against intellectual property [J].
Boldrin, M ;
Levine, D .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2002, 92 (02) :209-212
[10]  
COCKBURN I, 1988, AM ECON REV, V78, P419