Critical evaluation of factors required to terminate the postclosure monitoring period at solid waste landfills

被引:94
作者
Barlaz, MA
Rooker, AP
Kjeldsen, P
Gabr, MA
Borden, RC
机构
[1] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[2] Tech Univ Denmark, DK-2800 Lyngby KGS, Denmark
关键词
D O I
10.1021/es011245u
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Regulations governing the disposal of solid waste in landfills specify that they must be monitored for 30 years after closure unless this period is extended by the governing regulatory authority. Given the wide range of conditions under which refuse is buried, technical criteria, rather than a specific time period, are preferable for evaluation of when it is acceptable to terminate postclosure monitoring. The objectives of this paper are to identify and evaluate parameters that can be used to define the end of the postclosure monitoring period and to present a conceptual framework for an investigation of whether postclosure monitoring can be terminated at a landfill. Parameters evaluated include leachate composition and leachate and gas production. Estimates of leachate production from closed landfills are used to assess the potential environmental impacts of a hypothetical release to surface water or groundwater. The acceptability of gaseous releases should be evaluated against criteria for odors, the potential for subsurface migration, and greenhouse gas and ozone precursor emissions. The approach presented here must be tested on a site-specific basis to identify additional data requirements and regulatory activity that might be required to prepare regulators for the large number of requests to terminate postclosure monitoring expected over the next 20 years. An approach in which the frequency and extent of postclosure monitoring is reduced as warranted by site-specific data and impact analysis should provide an effective strategy to manage closed landfills.
引用
收藏
页码:3457 / 3464
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Comparison of solute transport in three composite liners [J].
Foose, GJ ;
Benson, CH ;
Edil, TB .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2002, 128 (05) :391-403
[22]  
GABR MA, 2000, GEOTECHNICAL NEWS, V18, P50
[23]   RATE OF LEAKAGE THROUGH A COMPOSITE LINER DUE TO GEOMEMBRANE DEFECTS [J].
GIROUD, JP ;
BADUTWENEBOAH, K ;
BONAPARTE, R .
GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 1992, 11 (01) :1-28
[24]   LANDFILL GAS EFFECTS ON GROUNDWATER SAMPLES AT A MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE FACILITY [J].
KERFOOT, HB .
JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 1994, 44 (11) :1293-1298
[25]   Attenuation of methane and nonmethane organic compounds in landfill gas affected soils [J].
Kjeldsen, P ;
Dalager, A ;
Broholm, K .
JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 1997, 47 (12) :1268-1275
[26]   A simple model for the distribution and fate of organic chemicals in a landfill: MOCLA [J].
Kjeldsen, P ;
Christensen, TH .
WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2001, 19 (03) :201-216
[27]   Composition of leachate from old landfills in Denmark [J].
Kjeldsen, P ;
Christophersen, M .
WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2001, 19 (03) :249-256
[28]   Release of CFC-11 from disposal of polyurethane foam waste [J].
Kjeldsen, P ;
Jensen, MH .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 35 (14) :3055-3063
[29]  
KJELDSEN P, IN PRESS CRIT REV EN
[30]  
KRUEMPELBECK I, 1999, SARDINIA 99, V1, P27