Test Length and Cognitive Fatigue: An Empirical Examination of Effects on Performance and Test-Taker Reactions

被引:182
作者
Ackerman, Phillip L. [1 ]
Kanter, Ruth [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Psychol, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
关键词
fatigue; ability; personality; trait complex; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; MENTAL FATIGUE; SELF-CONCEPT; PERSONALITY; INTELLIGENCE; INTERESTS; WORK; DETERMINANTS; KNOWLEDGE; RECOVERY;
D O I
10.1037/a0015719
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Person and situational determinants of cognitive ability test performance and subjective reactions were examined in the context of tests with different time-on-task requirements. Two hundred thirty-nine first-year university students participated in a within-participant experiment, with completely counterbalanced treatment conditions and test forms. Participants completed three test sessions of different length: (a) a standard-length SAT test battery (total time 41/2 hr), (b) a shorter SAT test battery (total time 31/2 hr), and (c) a longer SAT test battery (total time 51/2 hr). Consistent with expectations. subjective fatigue increased with increasing time-on-task. However, mean performance increased in the longer test length conditions, compared with the shorter test length condition. Individual differences in personality/interest/motivation trait complexes were found to have greater power than the test-length situations for predicting subjective cognitive fatigue before, during, and at the end of each test session. The relative contributions of traits and time-on-task for cognitive fatigue are discussed, along with implications for research and practice.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 181
页数:19
相关论文
共 85 条
[21]   BEHAVIORAL-INHIBITION, BEHAVIORAL ACTIVATION, AND AFFECTIVE RESPONSES TO IMPENDING REWARD AND PUNISHMENT - THE BIS BAS SCALES [J].
CARVER, CS ;
WHITE, TL .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 67 (02) :319-333
[22]   Reactions to cognitive ability tests: The relationships between race, test performance, face validity perceptions, and test-taking motivation [J].
Chan, D ;
Schmitt, N ;
DeShon, RP ;
Clause, CS ;
Delbridge, K .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 82 (02) :300-310
[23]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences, V2nd
[24]  
Costa P.T., 1992, NEO PI R PROFESSIONA
[25]   THE DISORGANIZATION OF BEHAVIOUR IN FATIGUE [J].
DAVIS, DR .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1946, 9 (01) :23-29
[26]   Fatigue: relationships with basic personality and temperament dimensions [J].
De Vries, J ;
Van Heck, GL .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2002, 33 (08) :1311-1324
[27]  
DHUYVETTER K, 1987, THESIS CALIFORNIA ST
[28]   The laws of relative fatigue [J].
Dodge, R .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1917, 24 (02) :89-113
[29]  
Ebbinghaus Hermann., 1897, Z F R PSYCHOLOGIE PH, V13, P401
[30]  
FairTest, 2021, MOR 1830 SCH DO NOT