The Tromso study: Artifacts in forearm bone densitometry prevalence and effects

被引:39
作者
Berntsen, GKR [1 ]
Tollan, A
Magnus, JH
Sogaard, AJ
Ringberg, T
Fonnebo, V
机构
[1] Univ Tromso, Inst Community Med, N-9037 Tromso, Norway
[2] Cent Hosp Hedmark, Dept Gynaecol, Hamar, Norway
[3] Natl Publ Hlth Inst, Dept Populat Hlth, Oslo, Norway
[4] Hosp Aabenraa, Aabenraa, Denmark
关键词
artifacts; BMD; densitometry; forearm; movement artifacts; region of interest;
D O I
10.1007/s001980050249
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Suboptimal performance of bone densitometer, operator and/or subject may cause artifacts of consequence both for individual patient management and research. The prevalence and effects of such artifacts are largely unknown in densitometry. A cross-sectional population-based study was carried out of artifacts in forearm bone densitometry with single X-ray Absorptiometry (SXA) of the nondominant hand (distal and ultradistal site). After the screening, all scans were reviewed for artifact detection and reanalysis. The effect on the bone mineral density (BMD) result was found by comparing artifactual scans with a reanalyzed version or with normal repeat scans. All women aged 50-74 years, all men aged 55-74 years and 5-10% samples of other age groups aged greater than or equal to 25 years attending the fourth Tromso health study were invited to have bone densitometry. The response rate from the background population was 80% (n = 7948). Fourteen percent of subjects had a movement artifact at either the distal or ultradistal site. The individual BMD variation was twice as large in scans with a movement artifact (0.94%) compared with normal scans (0.58%) (p = 0.0027). The radial endplate was inaccurately detected in 74% of the scans. Reanalysis of these scans led to a mean 3.8% decrease in the BMD value and an increase in the prevalence of osteoporosis of 10%. Artifacts were thus common, and their effects were clinically relevant in forearm bone densitometry. Artifacts and their effects need to be characterized in other bone densitometry settings also.
引用
收藏
页码:425 / 432
页数:8
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
ALTMAN DG, 1994, PRACTICAL STAT MED R, P403
[2]  
Beard C. Mary, 1994, Annals of Epidemiology, V4, P398
[3]   DIFFERENCES BETWEEN RESPONDENTS AND NONRESPONDENTS IN A POPULATION-BASED CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE STUDY [J].
CRIQUI, MH ;
BARRETTCONNOR, E ;
AUSTIN, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1978, 108 (05) :367-372
[4]   QUALITY-CONTROL OF DXA INSTRUMENTS IN MULTICENTER TRIALS [J].
FAULKNER, KG ;
MCCLUNG, MR .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1995, 5 (04) :218-227
[5]   QUALITY ASSURANCE FOR BONE DENSITOMETRY RESEARCH STUDIES - CONCEPT AND IMPACT [J].
GLUER, CC ;
FAULKNER, KG ;
ESTILO, MJ ;
ENGELKE, K ;
ROSIN, J ;
GENANT, HK .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1993, 3 (05) :227-235
[6]   THE EUROPEAN SPINE PHANTOM - A TOOL FOR STANDARDIZATION AND QUALITY-CONTROL IN SPINAL BONE-MINERAL MEASUREMENTS BY DXA AND QCT [J].
KALENDER, WA ;
FELSENBERG, D ;
GENANT, HK ;
FISCHER, M ;
DEQUEKER, J ;
REEVE, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1995, 20 (02) :83-92
[7]  
ROTHMAN KJ, 1998, MODERN EPIDEMIOLOGY, P115
[8]  
STEIGER P, 1992, J BONE MINER RES, V7, P625
[9]  
WAHNER HW, 1994, J BONE MINER RES, V9, P951
[10]  
World Health Organization, 1994, WHO TECHN REP SER, V843