Logistic Modeling to spatially predict the probability of soil drainage classes

被引:65
作者
Campling, P [1 ]
Gobin, A [1 ]
Feyen, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Louvain, Lab Soil & Water, Fac Agr & Appl Biol Sci, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
关键词
D O I
10.2136/sssaj2002.1390
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Logistic models were developed to spatially predict the probability of drainage classes in a humid tropical area (58 900 ha) using sampled terrain attributes from a digital elevation model, and vegetation indices from a LANDSAT-5 Thematic Mapper image. Soil drainage classes were assigned on the basis of the local water table regime depth, determined by soil morphological indicators, to 295 pseudo-randomly selected soil auger hole observations (calibration data set) and 72 soil pedon observations (validation data set). Six drainage classes were identified: excessively (D1), well (D2), moderately well (D3), imperfectly (D4), poorly (D5), and very poorly (D6). A nested dichotomous modeling strategy of progressively separating the six drainage classes was adopted, and resulted in five multivariate logistic models. The best performing model, predicting the probability of nonhydric (D1D2) soils versus hydric (D3D4D5D6) soils had a concordance of 99%, and the worst performing model, predicting the probability of imperfectly (134) drained soils versus moderately well (133) drained soils had a concordance of 65%. The most important spatial determinants were: elevation, slope, distance-to-the-river channel (DC), and vegetation indices. The logistic models were combined in a geographic information system (GIS) to derive soil drainage class maps using the gridded data sets of the significant variables. The results showed that digital elevation models and vegetation indices from LANDSAT-5 Thematic Mapper provide complementary information for developing statistical models to spatially predict and map soil drainage classes.
引用
收藏
页码:1390 / 1401
页数:12
相关论文
共 31 条
[21]   SOIL ATTRIBUTE PREDICTION USING TERRAIN ANALYSIS [J].
MOORE, ID ;
GESSLER, PE ;
NIELSEN, GA ;
PETERSON, GA .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1993, 57 (02) :443-452
[22]   DIGITAL TERRAIN MODELING - A REVIEW OF HYDROLOGICAL, GEOMORPHOLOGICAL, AND BIOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS [J].
MOORE, ID ;
GRAYSON, RB ;
LADSON, AR .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 1991, 5 (01) :3-30
[23]  
MOORE ID, 1988, T ASAE, V31, P1098, DOI 10.13031/2013.30829
[24]   SATURATION REGIONS IN CATCHMENTS AND THEIR RELATIONS TO SOIL AND TOPOGRAPHIC PROPERTIES [J].
OLOUGHLIN, EM .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1981, 53 (3-4) :229-246
[25]   ACCURACY OF LANDSAT-TM AND GIS RULE-BASED METHODS FOR FOREST WETLAND CLASSIFICATION IN MAINE [J].
SADER, SA ;
AHL, D ;
LIOU, WS .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1995, 53 (03) :133-144
[26]  
SAS Institute, 1990, SAS STAT US GUID VER, V2
[27]   Hydrology and hydric soil extent within a mollisol catena in southeastern Minnesota [J].
Thompson, JA ;
Bell, JC ;
Zanner, CW .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1998, 62 (04) :1126-1133
[28]   Quantitative soil-landscape modeling for estimating the areal extent of hydromorphic soils [J].
Thompson, JA ;
Bell, JC ;
Butler, CA .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1997, 61 (03) :971-980
[29]   RED AND PHOTOGRAPHIC INFRARED LINEAR COMBINATIONS FOR MONITORING VEGETATION [J].
TUCKER, CJ .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1979, 8 (02) :127-150
[30]   QUANTITATIVE-ANALYSIS OF LAND SURFACE-TOPOGRAPHY [J].
ZEVENBERGEN, LW ;
THORNE, CR .
EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS, 1987, 12 (01) :47-56