ConsDock: A new program for the consensus analysis of protein-ligand interactions

被引:99
作者
Paul, N [1 ]
Rognan, D [1 ]
机构
[1] CNRS, Bioinformat Grp, Lab Pharmacochim & Commun Cellulaire, UMR 7081, F-67400 Illkirch Graffenstaden, France
关键词
cheminformatics; clustering; docking; drug design; virtual screening;
D O I
10.1002/prot.10119
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Protein-based virtual screening of chemical libraries is a powerful technique for identifying new molecules that may interact with a macromolecular target of interest. Because of docking and scoring limitations, it is more difficult to apply as a lead optimization method because it requires that the docking/scoring tool is able to propose as few solutions as possible and all of them with a very good accuracy for both the protein-bound orientation and the conformation of the ligand. In the present study, we present a consensus docking approach (ConsDock) that takes advantage of three widely used docking tools (Dock, FlexX, and Gold). The consensus analysis of all possible poses generated by several docking tools is performed sequentially in four steps: (i) hierarchical clustering of all poses generated by a docking tool into families represented by a leader; (ii) definition of all consensus pairs from leaders generated by different docking programs; (iii) clustering of consensus pairs into classes, represented by a mean structure; and (iv) ranking the different means starting from the most populated class of consensus pairs. When applied to a test set of 100 protein-ligand complexes from the Protein Data Bank, ConsDock significantly outperforms single docking with respect to the docking accuracy of the top-ranked pose. In 60% of the cases investigated here, ConsDock was able to rank as top solution a pose within 2 Angstrom RMSD of the X-ray structure. It can be applied as a postprocessing filter to either single- or multiple-docking programs to prioritize three-dimensional guided lead optimization from the most likely docking solution.
引用
收藏
页码:521 / 533
页数:13
相关论文
共 52 条
[51]   How does consensus scoring work for virtual library screening? An idealized computer experiment [J].
Wang, RX ;
Wang, SM .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 2001, 41 (05) :1422-1426
[52]   SCORE: A new empirical method for estimating the binding affinity of a protein-ligand complex [J].
Wang, RX ;
Liu, L ;
Lai, LH ;
Tang, YQ .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MODELING, 1998, 4 (12) :379-394