Individual, cognitive and cultural differences in tax compliance: UK and Italy compared

被引:35
作者
Lewis, Alan [1 ]
Carrera, Sonia
Cullis, John [2 ]
Jones, Philip [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bath, Dept Psychol, Bath BA2 7AY, Avon, England
[2] Univ Bath, Dept Econ & Int Dev, Bath BA2 7AY, Avon, England
关键词
Tax compliance; Framing; Culture; Individual differences; PROSPECT-THEORY; MORALE;
D O I
10.1016/j.joep.2008.11.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Five hundred and five Italian psychology and economics students took part in a tax compliance study testing the influence of detection rates (within subjects) and the between subjects variables of framing effects, instructions to behave instrumentally or not, degree choice and gender, The sample was an improvement on a previous study conducted in the UK where the effects of gender and degree choice were entangled. The results from the Italian sample showed highly significant effects for detection rates, framing effects, gender and degree choice, Participants declared more as detection rates rose and when tax was framed as a gain. Males and economists declared the least. The instruction to maximise income (instrumentality) encouraged psychologists to declare less, while economists behaved instrumentally whether they were asked to or not. The influence of culture was examined by comparing the two data sets. Although the tax systems of these two countries are very similar, tax evasion is much more common in Italy. As anticipated Italian students declared less than UK students and the results for the Italian sample were more pronounced (e.g. the significant framing effect) but otherwise all are in the same direction. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed as the prospects for future empirical studies. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:431 / 445
页数:15
相关论文
共 24 条
[11]   Tax framing, instrumentality and individual differences: Are there two different cultures? [J].
Cullis, J ;
Jones, P ;
Lewis, A .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 27 (02) :304-320
[12]   DOES STUDYING ECONOMICS INHIBIT COOPERATION [J].
FRANK, RH ;
GILOVICH, T ;
REGAN, DT .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1993, 7 (02) :159-171
[13]  
Gilligan Carol., 1983, DIFFERENT VOICE PSYC
[14]  
*HM REV CUST, 2008, RAT ALLOW INC TAX
[15]   PROSPECT THEORY - ANALYSIS OF DECISION UNDER RISK [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
TVERSKY, A .
ECONOMETRICA, 1979, 47 (02) :263-291
[16]   Tax compliance within the context of gain and loss situations, expected and current asset position, and profession [J].
Kirchler, E ;
Maciejovsky, B .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 22 (02) :173-194
[17]  
Kirchler E., 2007, The economic psychology of tax behavior
[18]   All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects [J].
Levin, IP ;
Schneider, SL ;
Gaeth, GJ .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1998, 76 (02) :149-188
[19]   A new look at framing effects: Distribution of effect sizes, individual differences, and independence of types of effects [J].
Levin, IP ;
Gaeth, GJ ;
Schreiber, J ;
Lauriola, M .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2002, 88 (01) :411-429
[20]  
LWEIS A, 1982, PSYCHOL TAXATION