Additive Utility in Prospect Theory

被引:104
作者
Bleichrodt, Han [1 ]
Schmidt, Ulrich [2 ,3 ]
Zank, Horst [4 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Econ, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Kiel, Kiel Inst World Econ, D-24098 Kiel, Germany
[3] Univ Kiel, Dept Econ, D-24098 Kiel, Germany
[4] Univ Manchester, Sch Social Sci, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
关键词
additive utility; prospect theory; decision weighting; loss aversion; PROBABILITY WEIGHTING FUNCTION; PARAMETER-FREE ELICITATION; LOSS AVERSION; NONEXPECTED UTILITY; DECISION-ANALYSIS; UNCERTAINTY; CHOICE; FOUNDATIONS; RISK; PREFERENCE;
D O I
10.1287/mnsc.1080.0978
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Prospect theory is currently the main descriptive theory of decision under uncertainty. It generalizes expected utility by introducing nonlinear decision weighting and loss aversion. A difficulty in the study of multiattribute utility under prospect theory is to determine when an attribute yields a gain or a loss. One possibility, adopted in the theoretical literature on multiattribute utility under prospect theory, is to assume that a decision maker determines whether the complete outcome is a gain or a loss. In this holistic evaluation, decision weighting and loss aversion are general and attribute-independent. Another possibility, more common in the empirical literature, is to assume that a decision maker has a reference point for each attribute. We give preference foundations for this attribute-specific evaluation where decision weighting and loss aversion are depending on the attributes.
引用
收藏
页码:863 / 873
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Parameter-free elicitation of utility and probability weighting functions [J].
Abdellaoui, M .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2000, 46 (11) :1497-1512
[2]   Choice-based elicitation and decomposition of decision weights for gains and losses under uncertainty [J].
Abdellaoui, M ;
Vossmann, F ;
Weber, M .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2005, 51 (09) :1384-1399
[3]   A tractable method to measure utility and loss aversion under prospect theory [J].
Abdellaoui, Mohammed ;
Bleichrodt, Han ;
L'Haridon, Olivier .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2008, 36 (03) :245-266
[4]   Loss aversion under prospect theory: A parameter-free measurement [J].
Abdellaoui, Mohammed ;
Bleichrodt, Han ;
Paraschiv, Corina .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2007, 53 (10) :1659-1674
[5]   Reconciling introspective utility with revealed preference: Experimental arguments based on prospect theory [J].
Abdellaoui, Mohammed ;
Barrios, Carolina ;
Wakker, Peter P. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2007, 138 (01) :356-378
[6]   A test of the theory of reference-dependent preferences [J].
Bateman, I ;
Munro, A ;
Rhodes, B ;
Starmer, C ;
Sugden, R .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1997, 112 (02) :479-505
[7]   New paradoxes of risky decision making [J].
Birnbaum, Michael H. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2008, 115 (02) :463-501
[8]   A parameter-free elicitation of the probability weighting function in medical decision analysis [J].
Bleichrodt, H ;
Pinto, JL .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2000, 46 (11) :1485-1496
[9]   A characterization of quality adjusted life-years under cumulative prospect theory [J].
Bleichrodt, H ;
Miyamoto, J .
MATHEMATICS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2003, 28 (01) :181-193
[10]   Loss aversion and scale compatibility in two-attribute trade-offs [J].
Bleichrodt, H ;
Pinto, JL .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 46 (03) :315-337