Auditory event-related potentials while ignoring tone stimuli: Attentional differences reflected in stimulus intensity and latency responses in low and highly hypnotizable persons

被引:11
作者
Crawford, HJ
Corby, JC
Kopell, BS
机构
[1] VET ADM MED CTR,PSYCHIAT SERV,PALO ALTO,CA
[2] STANFORD UNIV,SCH MED,DEPT PSYCHIAT & BEHAV SCI,STANFORD,CA 94305
关键词
auditory event-related potentials; hypnotic susceptibility; hypnosis; attention;
D O I
10.3109/00207459608986351
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Effect of hypnotic susceptibility level on auditory event-related potentials (AERPs) was studied as subjects were instructed to ignore tones while reading a novel or counting one's pulse. Assessed previously on two hypnotic susceptibility scales [Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility; Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C (SHSSC)], subjects were 12 low (lows; SHSSC 0-2) and 12 highly (highs; SHSSC 9-12) hypnotizable, right-handed college students. AERPs were recorded at C3, C4, and Cz to 50 ms 1,961 tone pips 50, 60, 70 and 80 dB intensities, pseudorandomly presented at 1.5 intervals. As predicted, highs had significantly smaller N1 and P2 amplitudes than did lows when ignoring tones. As stimuli intensities increased, N1 latencies decreased for lows while N1 latencies increased for highs. N1 latency slopes across the 50 to 80 dB intensities were significantly more negative for lows than highs; slopes correlated significantly with both hypnotizability and absorption (Tellegen Absorption Scale). Thus, the highs appeared to divert greater attentional processing to the tasks at hand, particularly as the tones increased in intensity, and were slower to respond to not-to-be-attended stimuli. These results are interpreted as further evidence for hypnotic susceptibility being associated with efficient attentional processing such that highs can more effectively partition attention towards relevant stimuli and away from irrelevant stimuli than can low hypnotizables.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 70
页数:14
相关论文
共 56 条
[21]   HYPNOTIC ANALGESIA REDUCES R-III NOCICEPTIVE REFLEX - FURTHER EVIDENCE CONCERNING THE MULTIFACTORIAL NATURE OF HYPNOTIC ANALGESIA [J].
KIERNAN, BD ;
DANE, JR ;
PHILLIPS, LH ;
PRICE, DD .
PAIN, 1995, 60 (01) :39-47
[22]  
KRIPPNER S, 1974, AM J CLIN HYPN, V16, P166
[23]  
KROPOTOV JD, 1995, IN PRESS INT J PSYCH
[24]  
KUNZENDORF RG, 1995, IN PRESS IMAGINATION
[25]  
MESZAROS I, 1981, BRAIN BEHAV ADV PHYS, V17, P467
[26]  
MESZAROS I, 1989, SUGGESTION SUGGESTIB, P155
[27]   THE ROLE OF ATTENTION IN AUDITORY INFORMATION-PROCESSING AS REVEALED BY EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS AND OTHER BRAIN MEASURES OF COGNITIVE FUNCTION [J].
NAATANEN, R .
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 1990, 13 (02) :201-232
[28]   THE N1 WAVE OF THE HUMAN ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC RESPONSE TO SOUND - A REVIEW AND AN ANALYSIS OF THE COMPONENT STRUCTURE [J].
NAATANEN, R ;
PICTON, T .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1987, 24 (04) :375-425
[29]  
Naatanen R., 2018, Attention and brain function
[30]   DISINHIBITION AND THE PROCESSING OF AUDITORY STIMULUS-INTENSITY - AN ERP-STUDY [J].
ORLEBEKE, JF ;
KOK, A ;
ZEILLEMAKER, CW .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 1989, 10 (04) :445-451