Acid reflux is a poor predictor for severity of erosive reflux esophagitis

被引:44
作者
Avidan, B
Sonnenberg, A
Schnell, TG
Sontag, SJ
机构
[1] Dept Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Gastroenterol Sect, Albuquerque, NM 87108 USA
[2] Vet Affairs Hosp, Hines, IL USA
关键词
erosive reflux esophagitis; esophageal manometry; esophageal pH-metry; hiatal hernia;
D O I
10.1023/A:1020580630594
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
It is unknown which factors determine the severity of mucosal damage in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Our aim was to test whether the amount of esophageal acid exposure could predict the severity of esophageal injury in erosive reflux esophagitis. A total of 644 outpatients with symptomatic GERD underwent an esophagogastroduodenoscopy followed by esophageal manometry and 24-h pH monitoring. GERD was graded according to the endoscopic severity of mucosal damage as no erosions, single erosions, confluent erosions, esophageal ulcers, and strictures. A multiple linear regression was used to assess the joint influences of demographic characteristics, social habits, endoscopic anatomy, and various parameters of esophageal function tests on the severity of erosive reflux disease. No clear-cut association between the amount of acid reflux and the severity of erosive reflux esophagitis could be established. All individual parameters of esophageal pH monitoring, such as upright or supine acid contact time, frequency of all or only long reflux episodes, and an overall summary score of pH-metry, revealed no or only a weak correlation with the severity grade of erosive reflux esophagitis. Similarly, the pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter was only slightly more decreased in patients with extensive erosive esophagitis as compared to subjects without esophageal erosions. In the multiple linear regression, the presence of hiatus hernia was a stronger predictor of disease severity than any of the other parameters. In conclusion, factors other than exposure of the esophageal mucosa to acid must contribute to the development of erosive esophagitis.
引用
收藏
页码:2565 / 2573
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] CONCENTRATION OF REFLUXED ACID AND ESOPHAGEAL MUCOSAL INJURY
    BREMNER, RM
    CROOKES, PF
    DEMEESTER, TR
    PETERS, JH
    STEIN, HJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1992, 164 (05) : 522 - 527
  • [2] The pattern of esophageal acid exposure in gastroesophageal reflux disease influences the severity of the disease
    Campos, GMR
    Peters, JH
    DeMeester, TR
    Öberg, S
    Crookes, PF
    Mason, RJ
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 1999, 134 (08) : 882 - 887
  • [3] Castell DO, 1996, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V91, P1749
  • [4] Speed of healing and symptom relief in grade II to IV gastroesophageal reflux disease: A meta-analysis
    Chiba, N
    DeGara, CJ
    Wilkinson, JM
    Hunt, RH
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1997, 112 (06) : 1798 - 1810
  • [5] Rabeprazole in treatment of acid peptic diseases - Results of three placebo-controlled dose-response clinical trials in duodenal ulcer, gastric ulcer, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)
    Cloud, ML
    Enas, N
    Humphries, TJ
    Bassion, S
    [J]. DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 1998, 43 (05) : 993 - 1000
  • [6] BASAL ACID OUTPUT AND GASTRIC-ACID HYPERSECRETION IN GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE - CORRELATION WITH RANITIDINE THERAPY
    COLLEN, MJ
    JOHNSON, DA
    SHERIDAN, MJ
    [J]. DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 1994, 39 (02) : 410 - 417
  • [7] PATTERNS OF GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX IN HEALTH AND DISEASE
    DEMEESTER, TR
    JOHNSON, LF
    JOSEPH, GJ
    TOSCANO, MS
    HALL, AW
    SKINNER, DB
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1976, 184 (04) : 459 - 470
  • [8] MECHANISMS OF GASTRO-ESOPHAGEAL REFLUX IN PATIENTS WITH REFLUX ESOPHAGITIS
    DODDS, WJ
    DENT, J
    HOGAN, WJ
    HELM, JF
    HAUSER, R
    PATEL, GK
    EGIDE, MS
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1982, 307 (25) : 1547 - 1552
  • [9] Everhart, 1994, NIH PUBLICATION, V94, P299
  • [10] COMPOSITION OF GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUXATE
    GOTLEY, DC
    MORGAN, AP
    BALL, D
    OWEN, RW
    COOPER, MJ
    [J]. GUT, 1991, 32 (10) : 1093 - 1099