Preferences for aspects of a dermatology consultation

被引:44
作者
Coast, J.
Salisbury, C.
de Berker, D.
Noble, A.
Horrocks, S.
Peters, T. J.
Flynn, T. N.
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Hlth Serv Management Ctr, Hlth Econ Facil, Birmingham B15 2RT, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Dept Community Based Med, Bristol, Avon, England
[3] Univ Bristol, MRC, Hlth Serv Res Collaborat, Bristol, Avon, England
[4] Bristol Royal Infirm & Gen Hosp, Bristol Dermatol Ctr, Bristol BS2 8HW, Avon, England
[5] Univ W England, Fac Hlth & Social Care, Bristol BS16 1QY, Avon, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
dermatology outpatient care; discrete choice experiment; expertise; general practitioner with special interests; waiting; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; GENERAL-PRACTITIONER; WOMENS PREFERENCES; CONJOINT-ANALYSIS; PRIMARY-CARE; SERVICE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07328.x
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
General practitioners with special interests (GPSIs) are increasingly being used to provide dermatology services in the U.K. Little is known about U.K. dermatology patient attitudes to proposed variations in secondary care service delivery or the values they attach to aspects of the care they receive. To quantify preferences for different attributes of care within dermatology secondary care services. Attributes of care that are important to dermatology patients were derived using in-depth qualitative interviews with 19 patients at different points in the care pathway. A discrete choice experiment using 'best-worst scaling' was sent by post to 119 patients referred to secondary care dermatology services and suitable for GPSI care who had agreed to participate in research. Four attributes were derived from the qualitative work: waiting, expertise, thorough care and convenience. For the discrete choice experiment, 99 patients returned questionnaires, 93 of which contained sufficient data for analysis. All attributes were found to be quantitatively important. The attribute of greatest importance was expertise of the doctor, while waiting time was of least importance. Respondents were willing to wait longer than the current 3 months maximum to receive care that was thorough, 2.1 months to see a team led by an expert and 1.3 months to attend a consultation that is easy to get to. Although the need to reduce outpatient waiting times is a key policy driver behind the expansion of GPSI services, this does not appear to be the most important issue for patients. The thoroughness with which the consultation is provided and the expertise of the clinician seen are higher priorities.
引用
收藏
页码:387 / 392
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Economic evaluation of a general practitioner with special interest led dermatology service in primary care [J].
Coast, J ;
Noble, S ;
Noble, A ;
Horrocks, S ;
Asim, O ;
Peters, TJ ;
Salisbury, C .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 331 (7530) :1444-1448
[2]  
COAST J, IN PRESS J HLTH SERV
[3]   Patient satisfaction with teledermatology: quantitative and qualitative results from a randomized controlled trial [J].
Collins, K ;
Walters, S ;
Bowns, I .
JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE, 2004, 10 (01) :29-33
[4]  
Department of Health, 2000, Revised consolidated 3year work plan for the Methodology Working Party (MWP)
[5]  
Department of Health/Royal College of General Practitioners, 2002, IMPL SCHEM GEN PRACT
[6]  
Federman DG, 2001, ARCH DERMATOL, V137, P25
[7]  
FLYNN TN, 2005, HLTH EC STUD GROUP M
[8]   Assessing women's preferences for intrapartum care [J].
Hundley, V ;
Ryan, M ;
Graham, W .
BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2001, 28 (04) :254-263
[9]  
LOUVIERE JJ, 2000, MEMETRICS WHITE PAPE, V1, P1
[10]  
LOUVIERE JJ, 1995, ADV MARKETING RES, P223