Further development and validation of empirical scoring functions for structure-based binding affinity prediction

被引:978
作者
Wang, RX
Lai, LH
Wang, SM
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Med Chem & Comprehens Canc Ctr, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Peking Univ, Inst Phys Chem, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
关键词
binding affinity prediction; consensus scoring; empirical scoring molecular docking; structure-based drug design;
D O I
10.1023/A:1016357811882
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
New empirical scoring functions have been developed to estimate the binding affinity of a given protein-ligand complex with known three-dimensional structure. These scoring functions include terms accounting for van der Waals interaction, hydrogen bonding, deformation penalty, and hydrophobic effect. A special feature is that three different algorithms have been implemented to calculate the hydrophobic effect term, which results in three parallel scoring functions. All three scoring functions are calibrated through multivariate regression analysis of a set of 200 protein-ligand complexes and they reproduce the binding free energies of the entire training set with standard deviations of 2.2 kcal/mol, 2.1 kcal/mol, and 2.0 kcal/mol, respectively. These three scoring functions are further combined into a consensus scoring function, X-CSCORE. When tested on an independent set of 30 protein-ligand complexes, X-CSCORE is able to predict their binding free energies with a standard deviation of 2.2 kcal/mol. The potential application of X-CSCORE to molecular docking is also investigated. Our results show that this consensus scoring function improves the docking accuracy considerably when compared to the conventional force field computation used for molecular docking.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 26
页数:16
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
AJAY MMA, 1995, J MED CHEM, V38, P4953
[2]   NEW METHOD FOR PREDICTING BINDING-AFFINITY IN COMPUTER-AIDED DRUG DESIGN [J].
AQVIST, J ;
MEDINA, C ;
SAMUELSSON, JE .
PROTEIN ENGINEERING, 1994, 7 (03) :385-391
[3]   Molecular recognition of protein-ligand complexes: Applications to drug design [J].
Babine, RE ;
Bender, SL .
CHEMICAL REVIEWS, 1997, 97 (05) :1359-1472
[4]   The Protein Data Bank [J].
Berman, HM ;
Westbrook, J ;
Feng, Z ;
Gilliland, G ;
Bhat, TN ;
Weissig, H ;
Shindyalov, IN ;
Bourne, PE .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2000, 28 (01) :235-242
[5]   Prediction of binding constants of protein ligands: A fast method for the prioritization of hits obtained from de novo design or 3D database search programs [J].
Bohm, HJ .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 1998, 12 (04) :309-323
[6]   Current computational tools for de novo ligand design [J].
Bohm, HJ .
CURRENT OPINION IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 1996, 7 (04) :433-436
[7]  
BOHM HJ, 1992, J COMPUT AID MOL DES, V6, P61, DOI 10.1007/bf00124387
[9]   AN EXTENDED LINEAR-RESPONSE METHOD FOR DETERMINING FREE-ENERGIES OF HYDRATION [J].
CARLSON, HA ;
JORGENSEN, WL .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY, 1995, 99 (26) :10667-10673
[10]   Consensus scoring: A method for obtaining improved hit rates from docking databases of three-dimensional structures into proteins [J].
Charifson, PS ;
Corkery, JJ ;
Murcko, MA ;
Walters, WP .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 1999, 42 (25) :5100-5109