The auditory-evoked N2 and P3 components in the stop-signal task: Indices of inhibition, response-conflict or error-detection?

被引:166
作者
Dimoska, Aneta [1 ]
Johnstone, Stuart J.
Barry, Robert J.
机构
[1] Univ Wollongong, Brain & Behav Res Inst, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
[2] Univ Wollongong, Dept Psychol, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
关键词
stop-signal task; response inhibition; response conflict; error detection; N2; P3; Ne; Pe; event-related potentials (ERPs);
D O I
10.1016/j.bandc.2006.03.011
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The N2 and P3 components have been separately associated with response inhibition in the stop-signal task, and more recently, the N2 has been implicated in the detection of response-conflict. To isolate response inhibition activity from early sensory processing, the present study compared processing of the stop-signal with that of a task-irrelevant tone, which subjects were instructed to ignore. Stop-signals elicited a larger N2 on failed-stop trials and a larger P3 on successful-stop trials, relative to ignore-signal trials, likely reflecting activity related to failed and successful stopping, respectively. ERPs between fast and slow reaction-time (RT) groups were also examined as it was hypothesised that greater inhibitory activation to stop faster responses would manifest in the component reflecting this process. Successful-stop P3 showed the anticipated effect (globally larger amplitude in the fast than slow RT group), supporting its association with the stopping of an ongoing response. In contrast, N2 was larger in the slow than fast RT group, and in contrast to the predictions of the response-conflict hypothesis, successful-stop N2 and the response-locked error-negativity (Ne) differed in scalp distribution. These findings indicate that the successful-stop N2 may be better explained as a deliberate form of response control or selection, which the slow RT group employed as a means of increasing the likelihood of a successful-stop. Finally, a comparison of stimulus and response-locked ERPs revealed that the failed-stop N2 and P3 appeared to reflect error-related activity, best observed in the response-locked Ne and error-positivity (Pe). Together these findings indicate that the successful-stop N2 and P3 reflect functionally distinct aspects of response control that are dependent upon performance strategies, while failed-stop N2 and P3 reflect error-related activity. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:98 / 112
页数:15
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1995, ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY MI
  • [2] Inhibitory motor control in stop paradigms: review and reinterpretation of neural mechanisms
    Band, GPH
    van Boxtel, GJM
    [J]. ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1999, 101 (2-3) : 179 - 211
  • [3] Speed-accuracy modulation in case of conflict: the roles of activation and inhibition
    Band, GPH
    Ridderinkhof, KR
    van der Molen, MW
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2003, 67 (04): : 266 - 279
  • [4] Disentangling deficits in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
    Bekker, EM
    Overtoom, CCE
    Kooij, JJS
    Buitelaar, JK
    Verbaten, MN
    Kenemans, JL
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 62 (10) : 1129 - 1136
  • [5] The pure electrophysiology of stopping
    Bekker, EM
    Kenemans, JL
    Hoeksma, MR
    Talsma, D
    Verbaten, MN
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 55 (02) : 191 - 198
  • [6] Bjorklund David F., 1995, P141, DOI 10.1016/B978-012208930-5/50006-4
  • [7] Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance
    Carter, CS
    Braver, TS
    Barch, DM
    Botvinick, MM
    Noll, D
    Cohen, JD
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1998, 280 (5364) : 747 - 749
  • [8] Implication of right frontostriatal circuitry in response inhibition and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
    Casey, BJ
    Castellanos, FX
    Giedd, JN
    Marsh, WL
    Hamburger, SD
    Schubert, AB
    Vauss, YC
    Vaituzis, AC
    Dickstein, DP
    Sarfatti, SE
    Rapoport, JL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 1997, 36 (03) : 374 - 383
  • [9] Why is there an ERN/Ne on correct trials? Response representations, stimulus-related components, and the theory of error-processing
    Coles, MGH
    Scheffers, MK
    Holroyd, CB
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 56 (03) : 173 - 189
  • [10] IN SEARCH OF THE POINT OF NO RETURN - THE CONTROL OF RESPONSE PROCESSES
    DEJONG, R
    COLES, MGH
    LOGAN, GD
    GRATTON, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1990, 16 (01) : 164 - 182