Energy resources' utilization in organic and conventional vineyards: Energy flow, greenhouse gas emissions and biofuel production

被引:70
作者
Kavargiris, Stefanos E. [1 ]
Mamolos, Andreas P. [1 ]
Tsatsarelis, Constantinos A. [2 ]
Nikolaidou, Anna E. [1 ]
Kalburtji, Kiriaki L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Fac Agr, Lab Ecol & Environm Protect, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece
[2] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Fac Agr, Lab Agr Engn, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece
关键词
Bioethanol; Energy analysis; Greenhouse effect; Organic farming; Vitis vinifera L; APPLE PRODUCTION; FARMING SYSTEMS; AGRICULTURE; OLIVE; BIOETHANOL; FERTILIZER; BIOMASS; IMPACT; INPUT;
D O I
10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.05.006
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
An energy analysis, in conventional and organic vineyards, combined with ethanol production and greenhouse gas emissions, is useful in evaluating present situation and deciding best management strategies. The objective of this study was to evaluate the differences in the energy flow between organic and conventional vineyards in three locations, to calculate CO2, CH4 and N2O-emissions based on the used fossil energy and to explore if wine industry wastes can be used to extract bioethanol. The data were collected through personal interviews with farmers during 2004-2005. Eighteen farmers, who owned vineyards about 1 ha each, were randomly selected to participate in this study [(3 conventional and 3 organic) x 3 locations]. The means averaged over all locations for fertilizer application, plant protection products application, transportation, harvesting, labor, machinery, fuels, plant protections products and tools energy inputs, total energy inputs, outputs (grapes), outputs (grapes + shoots), grape yield, man hour, pomace and ethanol from pomace were significantly higher in conventional than in organic vineyards, while the opposite occurred for the pruning. Means averaged over two farming systems for harvesting, tools energy inputs, energy outputs (grapes), grape yield, pomace and ethanol from pomace were significantly higher at location A, followed by location C and location B. Finally, for irrigation, the means averaged over the two farming systems were significantly lower at location C. Greenhouse gas emissions were significant lower in organic than in conventional vineyards. The results show a clear response of energy inputs to energy outputs that resulted from the farming system and location. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1239 / 1250
页数:12
相关论文
共 80 条
[31]   Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels [J].
Hill, Jason ;
Nelson, Erik ;
Tilman, David ;
Polasky, Stephen ;
Tiffany, Douglas .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2006, 103 (30) :11206-11210
[32]   A method of energy balancing in crop production and its application in a long-term fertilizer trial [J].
Hülsbergen, KJ ;
Feil, B ;
Biermann, S ;
Rathke, GW ;
Kalk, WD ;
Diepenbrock, W .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2001, 86 (03) :303-321
[33]  
*IEO, 2006, DOEEIA0484
[34]  
*IPCC, 1997, GREENH GAS INV REF M, V3
[35]  
*ISO, 1997, 14040 ISO EUR COMM S
[36]  
*ISO, 1998, 14041 ISO EUR COMM S
[37]   Energy analysis of early, mid and late 20th century Swedish farming systems:: A local society case study [J].
Jansén, J .
JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE, 2001, 17 (04) :9-25
[38]  
Jarach M, 1985, RIV INGEGNERIA AGRAR, V2, P102
[39]  
Kaltsas AM., 2005, THESIS ARISTOTLE U T
[40]   Energy budget in organic and conventional olive groves [J].
Kaltsas, Apostolos M. ;
Mamolos, Andreas P. ;
Tsatsarelis, Constantinos A. ;
Nanos, George D. ;
Kalburtji, Kiriaki L. .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 122 (02) :243-251