Sexual dimorphism in environmental epigenetic programming

被引:211
作者
Gabory, Anne [1 ]
Attig, Linda [1 ]
Junien, Claudine [1 ]
机构
[1] Hop Necker Enfants Malad, INSERM, Genet & Epigenet Metab Dis U781, Clin Maurice Lamy, F-75743 Paris, France
关键词
Programming; Epigenetics; Sexual dimorphism; Nutrition; Environment; Transgenerational effects; HEPATIC GENE-EXPRESSION; INTRAUTERINE GROWTH-RETARDATION; DIETARY-PROTEIN RESTRICTION; TISSUE-SPECIFIC EXPRESSION; DNA METHYLATION; TRANSGENERATIONAL INHERITANCE; PREGNANT RATS; PREIMPLANTATION PERIOD; CHROMATIN-STRUCTURE; GLUCOSE-METABOLISM;
D O I
10.1016/j.mce.2009.02.015
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
The phenotype of an individual is the result of complex interactions between genotype and current, past and ancestral environment leading to a lifelong remodelling of our epigenomes. The vast majority of common diseases, including atherosclerosis, diabetes, osteoporosis, asthma, neuropsychological and autoimmune diseases, which often take root in early development, display some degree of sex bias, very marked in some cases. This bias could be explained by the role of sex chromosomes, the different regulatory pathways underlying sexual development of most organs and finally, lifelong fluctuating impact of sex hormones. A substantial proportion of dimorphic genes expression might be under the control of sex-specific epigenetic marks. Environmental factors such as social behaviour, nutrition or chemical compounds can influence, in a gender-related manner, these flexible epigenetic marks during particular spatiotemporal windows of life. Thus, finely tuned developmental program aspects, for each sex, may be more sensitive to specific environmental challenges, particularly during developmental programming and gametogenesis, but also throughout the individual's life under the influence of sex steroid hormones and/or sex chromosomes. An unfavourable programming could thus lead to various defects and different susceptibility to diseases between males and females. Recent studies suggest that this epigenetic programming could be sometimes transmitted to subsequent generations in a sex-specific manner and lead to transgenerational effects (TGEs). This review summarizes the current understanding in the field of epigenetic programming and highlights the importance of studying both sexes in epidemiological protocols or dietary interventions both in humans and in experimental animal models. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 18
页数:11
相关论文
共 105 条
[31]  
GALLOUKABANI C, 2007, AM J PHYSIOL-ENDOC M, V1095, pE7100
[32]  
Gluch A., 2008, V186, P67, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-72843-6_4
[33]   Non-genomic transgenerational inheritance of disease risk [J].
Gluckman, Peter D. ;
Hanson, Mark A. ;
Beedle, Alan S. .
BIOESSAYS, 2007, 29 (02) :145-154
[34]   Principles for modulation of the nuclear receptor superfamily [J].
Gronemeyer, H ;
Gustafsson, JÅ ;
Laudet, V .
NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2004, 3 (11) :950-964
[35]   Epigenetic reprogramming in mouse primordial germ cells [J].
Hajkova, P ;
Erhardt, S ;
Lane, N ;
Haaf, T ;
El-Maarri, O ;
Reik, W ;
Walter, J ;
Surani, MA .
MECHANISMS OF DEVELOPMENT, 2002, 117 (1-2) :15-23
[36]  
Hales Barbara F, 2005, J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr, P28
[37]   Hypergonadotrophinaemia with reduced uterine and ovarian size in women born small-for-gestational-age [J].
Ibáñez, L ;
Potau, N ;
Enriquez, G ;
Marcos, MV ;
de Zegher, F .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2003, 18 (08) :1565-1569
[38]   Environmental epigenomics and disease susceptibility [J].
Jirtle, Randy L. ;
Skinner, Michael K. .
NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2007, 8 (04) :253-262
[39]   Complex disease, gender and epigenetics [J].
Kaminsky, Zachary ;
Wang, Sun-Chong ;
Petronis, Arturas .
ANNALS OF MEDICINE, 2006, 38 (08) :530-544
[40]   Uteroplacental insufficiency affects epigenetic determinants of chromatin structure in brains of neonatal and juvenile IUGR [J].
Ke, X ;
Lei, Q ;
James, SJ ;
Kelleher, SL ;
Melnyk, S ;
Jernigan, S ;
Yu, X ;
Wang, L ;
Callaway, CW ;
Gill, G ;
Chan, GM ;
Albertine, KH ;
McKnight, RA ;
Lane, RH .
PHYSIOLOGICAL GENOMICS, 2006, 25 (01) :16-28