Patient radiation exposure in uterine artery embolization of leiomyomata: calculation of organ doses and effective dose

被引:38
作者
Vetter, S
Schultz, FW
Strecker, EP
Zoetelief, J
机构
[1] Diakonissen Hosp, Dept Radiol, D-76199 Karlsruhe, Germany
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Interfac Reactor Inst, NL-2629 JB Delft, Netherlands
关键词
uterine arteries; embolization; radiation exposure; effective dose; uterus; fibroids; Monte Carlo simulation;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-003-2088-0
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The goal of this study was estimation of patient effective dose from uterine artery embolization of leiomyomata. Parameters and data relevant to patient dose were recorded for 33 consecutive procedures. Using Monte Carlo simulation of radiation transport, organ and effective doses were calculated in detail for a subset of five procedures, to estimate the effective dose for all procedures. Mean dose area product was 59.9, median 23.4, and range 8.8-317.5 Gycm(2). Mean absorbed ovarian dose was calculated as 51 mGy in the five procedures. Using the dose conversion factor estimated from the Monte Carlo simulation for all procedures a mean estimated effective dose of 34 mSv (median 13 mSv, range 5-182 mSv) results, with a tendency to lower values regarding the succession of the procedures. Patients' radiation exposure level is up to twice of that of an abdominal CT examination . Angiographic equipment related dose-reducing features and radiographic technique essentially influence organ doses and effective dose. Consistent application of dose-reducing techniques and awareness of radiation exposure justifies uterine artery embolization as a therapeutic option for the treatment of uterine fibroids.
引用
收藏
页码:842 / 848
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Uterine arterial embolization: Factors influencing patient radiation exposure
    Andrews, RT
    Brown, PH
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2000, 217 (03) : 713 - 722
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1991, ANN ICRP, V60
  • [3] Briesmeister J.F., 2000, LA13709M LOS AL NAT
  • [4] Effective doses in standard protocols for multi-slice CT scanning
    Cohnen, M
    Poll, LW
    Puettmann, C
    Ewen, K
    Saleh, A
    Mödder, U
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (05) : 1148 - 1153
  • [5] Cranley K., 1997, Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine Report No.78
  • [6]
    [Z].
  • [7] KRAMER R, 1986, S885 GSF NAT RES CTR
  • [8] Embolization versus myomectomy versus hysterectomy - Which is best, when?
    Lumsden, MA
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2002, 17 (02) : 253 - 259
  • [9] Morbidity of 10,110 hysterectomies by type of approach
    Mäkinen, J
    Johansson, J
    Tomás, C
    Tomás, E
    Heinonen, PK
    Laatikainen, T
    Kauko, M
    Heikkinen, AM
    Sjöberg, J
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2001, 16 (07) : 1473 - 1478
  • [10] Pregnancy following uterine fibroid embolization
    McLucas, B
    Goodwin, S
    Adler, L
    Rappaport, A
    Reed, R
    Perrella, R
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2001, 74 (01) : 1 - 7