Uterine arterial embolization: Factors influencing patient radiation exposure

被引:59
作者
Andrews, RT [1 ]
Brown, PH [1 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth Sci Univ, Dotter Intervent Inst, Portland, OR 97201 USA
关键词
arteries; therapeutic embolization; dosimetry; leiomyoma; radiations; exposure to patients and personnel; uterine neoplasms; therapy;
D O I
10.1148/radiology.217.3.r00dc30713
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To investigate patient radiation exposures during uterine arterial embolization and the factors responsible for those exposures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical and procedural factors were evaluated for 42 consecutive procedures performed in 39 patients by one operator. Seven patients were excluded because of early termination (n = 1) or unusual conditions that necessitated extended procedures (n = 6). Fluoroscopic time, number of images acquired, height, and weight were available in the 35 remaining patients, and dose-area product (DAP) was available in 20. Equipment factors were evaluated by using a Lucite phantom in four angiography units from three manufacturers. RESULTS: The mean fluoroscopic time per case decreased from 30.6 to 14.2 minutes between the 1st and 5th quintiles. Mean DAP decreased from 211.4 to 30.6 Gy(.)cm(2) with dose reduction techniques; this primarily reflected a decreased number of acquired images. Phantom studies demonstrated many significant dose variations with magnification and equipment position. Low-dose and pulsed fluoroscopic modes reduced exposure rates in units so equipped, but roadmapping caused a silent switch to continuous fluoroscopy in two such units, which doubled the exposure rate. CONCLUSION: With operator experience and careful technique, uterine arterial embolization can be performed at radiation exposures comparable to those used in routine diagnostic studies. However, operators must be familiar with the technical parameters of their angiographic equipment.
引用
收藏
页码:713 / 722
页数:10
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Successful embolization of collaterals from the ovarian artery during uterine artery embolization for fibroids: A case report [J].
Andrews, RT ;
Bromley, PJ ;
Pfister, ME .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2000, 11 (05) :607-610
[2]  
ANDREWS RT, 1999, 11 ANN SCI M SOC MIN
[3]   Radiation safety considerations for diagnostic radiology personnel [J].
Brateman, L .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 1999, 19 (04) :1037-1055
[4]  
*COMM BIOL EFF ION, 1990, HLTH EFF EXP LOW LEV, P242
[5]  
Committee on the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation Board on Radiation Effects Research Commission on Life Sciences National Research Council, 1990, HLTH EFF EXP LOW LEV, P65
[6]  
GAGNE RM, 1995, SYLLABUS CATEGORICAL, P49
[7]   COMPARISON OF 2 METHODS FOR ASSESSING PATIENT DOSE FROM COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY [J].
GELEIJNS, J ;
VANUNNIK, JG ;
ZOETELIEF, J ;
ZWEERS, D ;
BROERSE, JJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1994, 67 (796) :360-365
[8]   Patient dose due to colon examination: Dose assessment and results from a survey in the Netherlands [J].
Geleijns, J ;
Broerse, JJ ;
Shaw, MPC ;
Schultz, FW ;
Teeuwisse, W ;
vanUnnik, JG ;
Zoetelief, J .
RADIOLOGY, 1997, 204 (02) :553-559
[9]   Uterine artery embolization for the treatment of uterine leiomyomata midterm results [J].
Goodwin, SC ;
McLucas, B ;
Lee, M ;
Chen, G ;
Perrella, R ;
Vedantham, S ;
Muir, S ;
Lai, A ;
Sayre, JW ;
DeLeon, M .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 1999, 10 (09) :1159-1165
[10]  
HART D, 1994, BRIT GOVT PUBLICATIO, P30