Quantification of valvular aortic stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging

被引:69
作者
Friedrich, MG [1 ]
Schulz-Menger, J [1 ]
Poetsch, T [1 ]
Pilz, B [1 ]
Uhlich, F [1 ]
Dietz, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Humboldt Univ, Franz Volhard Klin, Helios Klin, D-13125 Berlin, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mhj.2002.124057
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Assessing the aortic valvular orifice is important in judging the severity of aortic stenosis. Magnetic resonance imaging visualizes in-plane valvular motion. We studied the value of magnetic resonance planimetry of the aortic valve orifice. Methods We used breath-hold gradient echocardiographic sequences on a clinical magnetic resonance system (1.5 T) and studied 25 patients with symptomatic valvular aortic stenosis. We performed a planimetry of the valvular orifice in systolic images of the valvular plane. The results were compared with echocardiography (continuity equation) and cardiac catheterization (Gorlin formula). Results Magnetic resonance planimetry was feasible in all patients, and the image quality was invariably adequate. The magnetic resonance imaging results correlated well with the data calculated from catheterization and less robustly with the echocardiographic results. The 3 methods were similar in terms of leading to clinical decisions. Conclusions We suggest that magnetic resonance flow planimetry of the aortic valve orifice offers a simple, reliable, fast, and safe method to noninvasively quantify aortic stenosis.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 334
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] EFFECT OF CATHETER POSITIONING ON THE VARIABILITY OF MEASURED GRADIENT IN AORTIC-STENOSIS
    ASSEY, ME
    ZILE, MR
    USHER, BW
    KARAVAN, MP
    CARABELLO, BA
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR DIAGNOSIS, 1993, 30 (04): : 287 - 292
  • [2] Comparison of transesophageal echocardiographic, Fick, and thermodilution cardiac output in critically ill patients
    Axler, O
    Tousignant, C
    Thompson, CR
    DallavaSantucci, J
    Phang, PT
    Russell, JA
    Walley, KR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 1996, 11 (03) : 109 - 116
  • [3] Planimetry of aortic valve area using multiplane transoesophageal echocardiography is not a reliable method for assessing severity of aortic stenosis
    Bernard, Y
    Meneveau, N
    Vuillemenot, A
    Magnin, D
    Anguenot, T
    Schiele, F
    Bassand, JP
    [J]. HEART, 1997, 78 (01) : 68 - 73
  • [4] Guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease - Executive summary - A report of the American College of Cardiology American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (committee on management of patients with valvular heart disease)
    Bonow, RO
    Carabello, B
    de Leon, AC
    Edmunds, LH
    Fedderly, BJ
    Freed, MD
    Gaasch, WH
    McKay, CR
    Nishimura, RA
    O'Gara, PT
    O'Rourke, RA
    Rahimtoola, SH
    Ritchie, JL
    Cheitlin, MD
    Eagle, KA
    Gardner, TJ
    Garson, A
    Gibbons, RJ
    Russell, RO
    Ryan, TJ
    Smith, SC
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 1998, 98 (18) : 1949 - 1984
  • [5] FLOW DEPENDENCE OF MEASURES OF AORTIC-STENOSIS SEVERITY DURING EXERCISE
    BURWASH, IG
    PEARLMAN, AS
    KRAFT, CD
    MIYAKEHULL, C
    HEALY, NL
    OTTO, CM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1994, 24 (05) : 1342 - 1350
  • [6] Analysis of the effect of flow rate on the Doppler continuity equation for stenotic orifice area calculations - A numerical study
    DeGroff, CG
    Shandas, R
    Valdes-Cruz, L
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 1998, 97 (16) : 1597 - 1605
  • [7] CINE MR IMAGING IN AORTIC-STENOSIS
    DEROOS, A
    REICHEK, N
    AXEL, L
    KRESSEL, HY
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1989, 13 (03) : 421 - 425
  • [8] FISCHER JL, 1995, BRIT HEART J, V73, P293
  • [9] ANALYSIS OF THE COMPLICATIONS OF CARDIAC-CATHETERIZATION OVER 9 YEARS
    GWOST, J
    STOEBE, T
    CHESLER, E
    WEIR, EK
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR DIAGNOSIS, 1982, 8 (01): : 13 - 21
  • [10] Hoogeveen RM, 1999, MAGNET RESON MED, V41, P520, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(199903)41:3<520::AID-MRM14>3.0.CO